Cited by 28Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies

ESTABLISHING A RESEARCH AGENDA FOR INVESTIGATING ALTERNATIVE MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR CHRONIC PAIN

Berman, Brian M., Swyers, James P.·1997·Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice

Abstract

This article describes the University of Maryland School of Medicine's Center for Complementary Medicine Research approach to developing an agenda for investigating alternative medical treatments for chronic pain syndromes. This agenda includes conducting extensive literature searches and analyses to form a knowledge base for making clinical decisions on which chronic pain syndromes are in greatest need of better therapies, as well as which alternative medical therapies offer the greatest therapeutic promise for these specific chronic pain syndromes. To date, the Center has identified back pain, arthritis, and fibromyalgia as the chronic pain syndromes that contribute the greatest clinical and economic burden to overall chronic pain statistics. Not coincidentally, patients with these diagnoses are the greatest users of alternative therapies. The Center has identified acupuncture, homeopathy, manual/manipulative therapies, and mind-body therapies as the alternative medical therapies offering the greatest clinical potential for these three general chronic pain diagnoses. Preliminary data from the Center's ongoing clinical trials programs are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0095-4543(05)70308-0

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mechanism by which psychological therapies can reduce the negative effects of chronic pain is through increasing positive and meaningful behavioural change.

    “a number of studies indicating that the mechanism by which psychological therapies can reduce the negative effects of chronic pain is through increasing positive and meaningful behavioural change.16,17”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berman, B. M., & Swyers, J. P.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Venue
Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-12
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
743-758
ISSN
0095-4543 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007984767
Cited by
28
References
67
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Primary Care Clinics in Office Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Keywords
chronic pain, complementary therapy, complementary and alternative medicine, research agenda, back pain, arthritis, fibromyalgia, acupuncture, homeopathy, manual therapy, manipulative therapy, mind-body interventions, clinical trials, economic burden of pain
MeSH terms
Complementary Therapies, Chronic Disease, Humans, Pain, Patient Care Team, Primary Health Care, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review