Cited by 34Migration, Health and TraumaHealth and Conflict StudiesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Closing the gap between psychiatric epidemiology and mental health in post-conflict situations

de Jong, Joop TVM, Komproe, Ivan H·2002·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08729-9

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Jong, J. T., & Komproe, I. H.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
359
Issue
9320
Pages
1793-1794
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2077460682
Cited by
34
References
7
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
post-conflict mental health, Palestinian children, Second Intifada, emotionally disturbed children, war trauma, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, refugee mental health, psychiatric comorbidity
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Child, Female, Humans, Human Rights, Israel, Male, Warfare, Prevalence, Arabs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review