Cited by 218Surgical site infection preventionMedical History and InnovationsHistorical Medical Research and Treatments

On the antiseptic principle in the practice of surgery

Lister, Joseph·1867·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)51827-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using phenol as an antiseptic, Lister reduced the mortality of amputee patients to 15% in four years, compared to 45-50% who died of sepsis previously.

    “Using phenol as an antiseptic, he reduced the mortality of amputee patients to 15% in four years, compared to 45–50% who died of sepsis previously.”

    From Louis Pasteur: Between Myth and Reality (2022) · cites this paper as [58]

Authors
Lister, J.
Corresponding author
Lister, Joseph
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1867-09
Volume
90
Issue
2299
Pages
353-356
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2401523800
Cited by
218
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Lancet (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Innovations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Historical Medical Research and Treatments
Keywords
antiseptics, surgical antisepsis, surgical infection prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review