Cited by 27Eating Disorders and BehaviorsHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsEthics and bioethics in healthcare

The anorexia talking

Tan, Jacinta·2003·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14534-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tan, J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Tan, Jacinta
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-10
Volume
362
Issue
9391
Pages
1246
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2070708439
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (WT063792)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, treatment refusal, patient autonomy, medical paternalism, duty of care, psychiatric ethics, patient choice, eating disorders
MeSH terms
Anorexia Nervosa, Attitude to Health, Decision Making, Ethics, Medical, Female, Humans, Informed Consent, Male, Starvation, Treatment Refusal, Mental Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review