Cited by 55Eating Disorders and BehaviorsHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Mental Capacity, Decision-Making and Emotion Dysregulation in Severe Enduring Anorexia Nervosa

Open access
van Elburg, Annemarie, Danner, Unna Nora, Sternheim, Lot Catharina, Lammers, Mirjam, Elzakkers, Isis·2021·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Severe and Enduring Anorexia Nervosa (SE-AN) is a chronic eating disorder characterized by long-term starvation and its physical and psychological sequelae, and severe loss of quality of life. Interactions between neurobiological changes caused by starvation, vulnerability (personality) traits, and eating behaviors play a role. Several other factors, such as increased fear and decreased social cognition, have also been found in relation to SE-AN. With this in mind, we aim to add to the understanding of SE-AN by introducing the concept of mental capacity (MC), which refers to the ability to understand and process information—both on a cognitive and an emotional level—and then make a well-informed choice. MC may be an important construct within the context of SE-AN. Furthermore, we will argue how impaired decision-making processes may underlie, fuel, or contribute to limited MC in SE-AN. We will speculate on the importance of dysfunctional emotion processing and anxiety-related processes (e.g., a high intolerance of uncertainty) and their potential interaction with decision-making. Lastly, we will propose how these aspects, which to our knowledge have previously received little attention, may advise research and treatment or help in dealing with the “want but cannot” situation of life-threatening AN.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.545317

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has documented extensive cognitive impairments associated with malnutrition in anorexia nervosa, including brain atrophy, cognitive distortions, reduced executive functioning, and emotional processing issues.

    “This raises profound concerns, given that research has documented extensive cognitive impairments associated with malnutrition in anorexia nervosa, including brain atrophy, cognitive distortions, reduced executive functioning, and emotional processing issues (151–155).”

    From Assisted death in eating disorders: a systematic review of cases and clinical rationales (2024) · cites this paper as [155]

    The Emotional Processing and Decision-Making sections describe emotional-processing problems and disturbed decision-making in anorexia nervosa; the Mental Capacity section also describes distorted appreciation. The paper mentions neurobiological changes caused by starvation, but the passages do not document brain atrophy or reduced executive functioning, or attribute the full list of impairments to malnutrition. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Malnutrition exacerbates depressive and obsessional symptoms, promotes eating disordered cognitions, and impairs decision making.

    “malnutrition exacerbates depressive and obsessional symptoms, promotes eating disordered cognitions and impairs decision making [10, 11].”
  • Compulsory treatment is not the solution for all patients with diminished mental capacity who refuse treatment; in some situations, it may do more harm than good.

    “Van Elburg et al. [20] state,”CT [compulsory treatment] is not the solution for all patients with diminished MC [mental capacity] who refuse treatment. In some situations, it may do more harm than good.””

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Elburg, A., Danner, U. N., Sternheim, L. C., Lammers, M., & Elzakkers, I.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • GGNet (NL)
  • Altrecht GGZ (NL)
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2021-03-11
Volume
12
Pages
545317-545317
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3137665104
Cited by
55
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
severe and enduring anorexia nervosa, decision-making capacity, decision-making, emotional dysregulation, starvation, intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety, social cognition, personality traits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review