Routine oral nutritional supplementation for stroke patients in hospital (FOOD): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background Undernutrition is common in hospital patients with stroke, can develop or worsen in hospital, and is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to establish whether routine oral nutritional supplements improve outcome after stroke. Methods The FOOD trials are a family of three pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trials. We measured the outcomes of stroke patients who could swallow and who were randomly allocated normal hospital diet or normal hospital diet plus oral nutritional supplements until hospital discharge. The primary outcome was death or poor outcome (modified Rankin scale [MRS] grade 3-5), 6 months after enrollment, measured unaware of treatment allocation. Analysis was by intention to treat. Findings Between Nov 1, 1996, and July 31, 2003, 4023 patients were enrolled by 125 hospitals in 15 countries. Only 314 (8%) patients were judged to be undernourished at baseline. Vital status and MRS at the end of the trial were known for 4012 and 4004 patients, respectively. Supplemented diet was associated with an absolute reduction in risk of death of 0.7% (95% CI -1.4 to 2.7) and an increased risk of death or poor outcome of 0.7% (-2.3 to 3.8). Interpretation We could not confirm the anticipated 4% absolute benefit for death or poor outcome from routine oral nutritional supplements for mainly well nourished stroke patients in hospital. Our results would be compatible with a 1% or 2% absolute benefit or harm from oral supplements. These results do not sup…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The importance of providing nutritional support to those most in need is stressed.
“This stresses the importance of providing nutritional support to those most in need [45] (Level of Evidence 1þþ).”
From ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients (2023) · cites this paper as [45]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kernan, W. N., Ovbiagele, B., Black, H. R., Bravata, D. M., Chimowitz, M. I., Ezekowitz, M. D., Fang, M. C., Fisher, M., Furie, K. L., Heck, D. V., et al. (2014) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000024 · Cited by 5,170 · see citing works
Winstein, C. J., Stein, J., Arena, R., Bates, B., Cherney, L. R., Cramer, S. C., Deruyter, F., Eng, J. J., Fisher, B., Harvey, R. L., et al. (2016) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000098 · Cited by 3,293 · see citing works
Protein and energy supplementation in elderly people at risk from malnutrition
Milne, A. C., Potter, J., Vivanti, A., & Avenell, A. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003288.pub3 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
ESPEN guidelines on nutritional support for polymorbid internal medicine patients
Gomes, F., Schuetz, P., Bounoure, L., Austin, P., Ballesteros-Pomar, M., Cederholm, T., Fletcher, J., Laviano, A., Norman, K., Poulia, K.-A., et al. (2018) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.025 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients
Wunderle, C., Gomes, F., Schuetz, P., Stumpf, F., Austin, P., Ballesteros-Pomar, M. D., Cederholm, T., Fletcher, J., Laviano, A., Norman, K., et al. (2023) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2023.06.023 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
“This stresses the importance of providing nutritional support to those most in need [45] (Level of Evidence 1 þþ ).”
- Authors
- Dennis, M. S., Lewis, S. C., & Warlow, C. P.
- Affiliations
- Western General Hospital (GB)
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 365
- Issue
- 9461
- Pages
- 755-763
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W1477045134
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 17.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (96/29/01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
- Keywords
- stroke, oral nutritional supplementation, malnutrition, hospitalized patients, modified Rankin Scale, mortality, functional outcome, hospital food
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Energy Intake, Dietary Proteins, Eating, Female, Humans, Male, Prognosis, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Dietary Supplements, Stroke, Malnutrition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review