Cited by 165Pharmaceutical industry and healthcareEthics in Clinical ResearchStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Clinical trial registration: transparency is the watchword

Sim, Ida, Chan, An-Wen, Gülmezoglu, A Metin, Evans, Tim, Pang, Tikki·2006·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68708-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sim, I., Chan, A.-W., Gülmezoglu, A. M., Evans, T., & Pang, T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Sim, Ida
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
367
Issue
9523
Pages
1631-1633
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2064638166
Cited by
165
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
16.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
clinical trial registration, transparency, industry-funded trials, clinical trial recruitment
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Registries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review