The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Management of acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning
Open accessAbstract
Organophosphorus (OP) pesticide self-poisoning is a major clinical problem across the rural developing world, killing an estimated 200,000 people every year. Medical management is difficult, with case fatality often over 20%. In this review, we describe the limited evidence base that should guide therapy. Fifty years after first being used, we still do not know how the core treatment - atropine, oximes, and diazepam - should best be administered. Major constraints in collecting useful data have been the late recognition of great variety among OPs and the care that cholinesterase assays require for their results to be interpreted or compared between studies. However, consensus exists that early resuscitation with atropine, oxygen, respiratory support, and fluids is required to improve oxygenation of patients. The role of oximes is unclear - they may only benefit patients poisoned by some OPs or patients with moderate poisoning. Small studies have suggested possible benefit from new treatments, eg. magnesium sulphate, but much larger trials are needed. Gastric lavage may have a role but should only be considered once the patient is stable. RCTs are now underway in rural Asia to address particular aspects of therapy. However, some specific OP pesticides may ultimately prove very difficult to treat with current treatments such that focused bans may be the only method to substantially bring down the case fatality for OP poisoning. Improved medical management of OP poisoning will result in a marked reduction in the global number of deaths from suicide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land
Grimes, D. A., & Schulz, K. F. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07283-5 · Cited by 734
Cited by
Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors: Pharmacology and Toxicology
Colovic, M. B., Krstic, D. Z., Lazarevic-Pasti, T. D., Bondzic, A. M., & Vasic, V. M. (2013) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159x11311030006 · Cited by 2,611
Songa, E. A., & Okonkwo, J. O. (2016) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2016.04.046 · Cited by 373
Kumar, P., Kim, K.-H., & Deep, A. (2015) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2015.03.066 · Cited by 278
Masson, P., & Lockridge, O. (2010) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2009.12.005 · Cited by 233
Lavonas, E. J., Akpunonu, P. D., Arens, A. M., Babu, K. M., Cao, D., Hoffman, R. S., Hoyte, C. O., Mazer-Amirshahi, M. E., Stolbach, A., St-Onge, M., et al. (2023) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001161 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Eddleston, M., Buckley, N. A., Eyer, P., & Dawson, A. H.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 371
- Issue
- 9612
- Pages
- 597-607
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2107952228
- Cited by
- 1,190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 40.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61202-1
- The paper
- Eddleston, M., Buckley, N. A., Eyer, P., & Dawson, A. H. (2008). Management of acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61202-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.