Cited by 496Advanced Breast Cancer TherapiesBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesCancer Treatment and Pharmacology

Overall survival with sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (TROPiCS-02): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial

Open access
Rugo, Hope S, Bardia, Aditya, Marmé, Frederik, Cortés, Javier, Schmid, Peter, Loirat, Delphine, Trédan, Olivier, Ciruelos, Eva +10 more·2023·The Lancet

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacituzumab govitecan demonstrated significant progression-free survival benefit over chemotherapy in the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 trial in patients with pretreated, endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+ and HER2-) metastatic breast cancer with limited treatment options. Here, we report the protocol-specified final analysis of overall survival and endpoints by trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) expression and other variables. METHODS: In this randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial, which took place in 91 centres across North America (the USA and Canada) and Europe (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and the UK), patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive sacituzumab govitecan or chemotherapy (eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, or gemcitabine). Patients had confirmed HR+ and HER2- locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic breast cancer and had received at least one previous endocrine therapy, a taxane, and a CDK4/6 inhibitor in any setting and two to four previous chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (previously reported and not included in this analysis), and secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), and patient-reported outcomes. Overall survival was assessed using stratified log-rank tests and Cox regression. Trop-2 expression was assessed in tumour tissue by immunohistochemistry. In the statistical testing hierarchy, ORR and patient-reported outcomes were tested sequentially if overall survival was significant. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03901339. FINDINGS: At the data cutoff date of July 1, 2022, 543 of 776 screened patients were randomly assigned between May 30, 2019, and April 5, 2021, with 272 patients in the sacituzumab govitecan group and 271 patients in the chemotherapy group. With a 12·5-month (IQR 6·4-18·8) median follow-up, 390 deaths occurred among 543 patients. Overall survival was significantly improved with sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy (median 14·4 months [95% CI 13·0-15·7] vs 11·2 months [10·1-12·7]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·79, 95% CI 0·65-0·96; p=0·020); survival benefit was consistent across Trop-2 expression-level subgroups. ORR was significantly improved with sacituzumab govitecan compared with chemotherapy (57 [21%] patients vs 38 [14%]; odds ratio 1·63 [95% CI 1·03-2·56]; p=0·035), as was time to deterioration of global health status and quality of life (median 4·3 months vs 3·0 months; HR 0·75 [0·61-0·92]; p=0·0059) and fatigue (median 2·2 months vs 1·4 months; HR 0·73 [0·60-0·89]; p=0·0021). The safety profile of sacituzumab govitecan was consistent with previous studies (including the TROPiCS-02 primary analysis and the ASCENT trial). One fatal adverse event (septic shock caused by neutropenic colitis) was determined to be related to sacituzumab govitecan treatment. INTERPRETATION: Sacituzumab govitecan demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit over chemotherapy, with a 3·2-month median overall survival improvement and a manageable safety profile. These data support sacituzumab govitecan as a new treatment option for patients with pretreated, endocrine-resistant HR+ and HER2- metastatic breast cancer. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01245-x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TROP2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates sacituzumab govitecan and datopotamab deruxtecan showed promising clinical efficacy in several cancer entities, including locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer, and locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

    “The TROP2-targeted ADCs sacituzumab govitecan (SG) and datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) showed promising clinical efficacy in several cancer entities, including locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer,84 hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer85 and locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.86”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rugo, H. S., Bardia, A., Marmé, F., Cortés, J., Schmid, P., Loirat, D., Trédan, O., Ciruelos, E., Dalenc, F., Gómez Pardo, P., Jhaveri, K. L., Delaney, R., Valdez, T., Wang, H., Motwani, M., Yoon, O. K., Verret, W., & Tolaney, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • MedSIR (Spain) (ES)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Institut Curie (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES)
  • Institut Claudius Regaud (FR)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Gilead Sciences (United States) (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Rugo, Hope S
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
402
Issue
10411
Pages
1423-1433
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W4386102828
Cited by
496
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 158 · 2025: 183 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 16 · 2021: 1
FWCI
90.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Gilead Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Keywords
sacituzumab govitecan, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, HER2-negative breast cancer, metastatic breast cancer, overall survival, endocrine therapy resistance, chemotherapy, eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, gemcitabine, patient-reported outcomes, objective response rate, treatment-related adverse events
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Breast Neoplasms, Camptothecin, Female, Humans, Quality of Life, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Immunoconjugates, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review