Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

14-day triple, 5-day concomitant, and 10-day sequential therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection in seven Latin American sites: a randomised trial

Open access
Greenberg, E Robert, Anderson, Garnet L, Morgan, Douglas R, Torres, Javier, Chey, William D, Bravo, Luis Eduardo, Dominguez, Ricardo L, Ferreccio, Catterina, Herrero, Rolando, Lazcano-Ponce, Eduardo C, Meza-Montenegro, María Mercedes, Peña, Rodolfo, Peña, Edgar M, Salazar-Martínez, Eduardo, Correa, Pelayo, Martínez, María Elena, Valdivieso, Manuel, Goodman, Gary E, Crowley, John J, Baker, Laurence H·2011·The Lancet

Abstract

Summary Background Evidence from Europe, Asia, and North America suggests that standard three-drug regimens of a proton pump inhibitor plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin are significantly less effective for eradicating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection than five-day concomitant and ten-day sequential four-drug regimens that include a nitroimidazole. These four-drug regimens also entail fewer antibiotic doses and thus may be suitable for eradication programs in low-resource settings. Studies are limited from Latin America, however, where the burden of H. pylori-associated diseases is high. Methods We randomised 1463 men and women ages 21–65 selected from general populations in Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Mexico (two sites) who tested positive for H. pylori by a urea breath test (UBT) to: 14 days of lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (standard therapy); five days of lansoprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole (concomitant therapy); or five days of lansoprazole and amoxicillin followed by five of lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole (sequential therapy). Eradication was assessed by UBT six–eight weeks after randomisation. Findings In intention-to-treat analyses, the probability of eradication with standard therapy was 82·2%, which was 8·6% higher (95% adjusted CI: 2·6%, 14·5%) than with concomitant therapy (73·6%) and 5·6% higher (95% adjusted CI: −0·04%, 11·6%) than with sequential therapy (76·5%). In analyses limited to the 1314 participants who adhered to their assigned therapy, the probabilities of eradication were 87·1%, 78·7%, and 81·1% with standard, concomitant, and sequential therapies, respectively. Neither four-drug regimen was significantly better than standard triple therapy in any of the seven sites. Interpretation Standard 14-day triple-drug therapy is preferable to five-day concomitant or ten-day sequential four-drug regimens as empiric therapy for H. pylori among diverse Latin American populations. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and US National Institutes of Health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60825-8

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Greenberg, E. R., Anderson, G. L., Morgan, D. R., Torres, J., Chey, W. D., Bravo, L. E., Dominguez, R. L., Ferreccio, C., Herrero, R., Lazcano-Ponce, E. C., Meza-Montenegro, M. M., Peña, R., Peña, E. M., Salazar-Martínez, E., Correa, P., Martínez, M. E., Valdivieso, M., Goodman, G. E., Crowley, J. J., & Baker, L. H.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
378
Issue
9790
Pages
507-514
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2138283672
Cited by
257
References
29
FWCI
32.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 14-day triple, 5-day concomitant, and 10-day sequential therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection in seven Latin American sites: a randomised trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60825-8
The paper
Greenberg, E. R., Anderson, G. L., Morgan, D. R., Torres, J., Chey, W. D., Bravo, L. E., Dominguez, R. L., Ferreccio, C., Herrero, R., Lazcano-Ponce, E. C., Meza-Montenegro, M. M., Peña, R., Peña, E. M., Salazar-Martínez, E., Correa, P., Martínez, M. E., Valdivieso, M., Goodman, G. E., Crowley, J. J., & Baker, L. H. (2011). 14-day triple, 5-day concomitant, and 10-day sequential therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection in seven Latin American sites: a randomised trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60825-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.