Cited by 14Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Tackling domestic violence: is increasing referral enough?

Hegarty, Kelsey, Glasziou, Paul·2011·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61386-x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hegarty, K., & Glasziou, P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Bond University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hegarty, Kelsey
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
378
Issue
9805
Pages
1760-1762
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2041816860
Cited by
14
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bond University Research Portal (Bond University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
intimate partner violence, domestic violence, primary care, general practice training, complex problems, health system collaboration, women's health, violence against women, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Education, Medical, Continuing, Female, Humans, Primary Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Domestic Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review