The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behavioural treatment for adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome (FITNET): a randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background Chronic fatigue syndrome is characterised by persistent fatigue and severe disability. Cognitive behavioural therapy seems to be a promising treatment, but its availability is restricted. We developed Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET (FITNET), the first dedicated internet-based therapeutic program for adolescents with this disorder, and compared its effectiveness with that of usual care.Methods Adolescents aged 12-18 years with chronic fatigue syndrome were assigned to FITNET or usual care in a 1:1 ratio at one tertiary treatment centre in the Netherlands by use of a computer-generated blocked randomisation allocation schedule. The study was open label. Primary outcomes were school attendance, fatigue severity, and physical functioning, and were assessed at 6 months with computerised questionnaires. Analysis was by intention to treat. Thereafter, all patients were offered FITNET if needed. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN59878666.Findings 68 of 135 adolescents were assigned to FITNET and 67 to usual care, and 67 and 64, respectively, were analysed. FITNET was significantly more effective than was usual care for all dichotomised primary outcomes at 6 months-full school attendance (50 [75%] vs 10 [16%], relative risk 4·8, 95% CI 2·7-8·9; p<0·0001), absence of severe fatigue (57 [85%] vs 17 [27%], 3·2, 2·1-4·9; p<0·0001), and normal physical functioning (52 [78%] vs 13 [20%], 3·8, 2·3-6·3; p<0·0001). No serious adverse events were reported.Interpretation FITNET offers a readily accessible and highly effective treatment for adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome. The results of this study justify implementation on a broader scale.Funding Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Family-based CBT and internet-delivered CBT have proven effective in young patients with specific FSS.31–36”
Citations
Cites
The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Comprehensive Approach to Its Definition and Study
Fukuda, K., Straus, S. E., Hickie, I., Sharpe, M. C., Dobbins, J. G., Komaroff, A., & and International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. (1994) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-121-12-199412150-00009 · Cited by 4,969
Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome
Vercoulen, J. H. M. M., Swanink, C. M. A., Fennis, J. F. M., Galama, J. M. D., van der Meer, J. W. M., & Bleijenberg, G. (1994) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(94)90099-x · Cited by 1,306
Self-citationA Behavior Change Model for Internet Interventions
Ritterband, L. M., Thorndike, F. P., Cox, D. J., Kovatchev, B. P., & Gonder-Frederick, L. A. (2009) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9133-4 · Cited by 591
Internet-administered cognitive behavior therapy for health problems: a systematic review
Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., & Andersson, G. (2008) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-007-9144-1 · Cited by 555
Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a multicentre randomised controlled trial
Prins, J. B., Bleijenberg, G., Bazelmans, E., Elving, L. D., de Boo, T. M., Severens, J. L., van der Wilt, G. J., Spinhoven, P., & van der Meer, J. W. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04198-2 · Cited by 531
Self-citationStulemeijer, M., de Jong, L. W. A. M., Fiselier, T. J. W., Hoogveld, S. W. B., & Bleijenberg, G. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38301.587106.63 · Cited by 271
Self-citationSpence, S. H., Holmes, J. M., March, S., & Lipp, O. V. (2006) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.74.3.614 · Cited by 261
Cost Effectiveness of Internet Interventions: Review and Recommendations
Tate, D. F., Finkelstein, E. A., Khavjou, O., & Gustafson, A. (2009) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-009-9131-6 · Cited by 261
The persistence of fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis
Vercoulen, J. H. M. M., Swanink, C. M. A., Galama, J. M. D., Fennis, J. F. M., Jongen, P. J., Hommes, O. R., van der Meer, J. W. M., & Bleijenberg, G. (1998) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(98)00023-3 · Cited by 248
Self-citationRimes, K. A., Goodman, R., Hotopf, M., Wessely, S., Meltzer, H., & Chalder, T. (2007) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2231 · Cited by 200
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–208 of 208
When to address fatigue in juvenile idiopathic arthritis during clinical visits based on the JAMAR
Vroegindeweij, A., Musterd, S., Nijhof, S. L., Consolaro, A., Vastert, S. J., de Roock, S., & Swart, J. F. (2025) · Lara D. Veeken · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keaf325
Self-citationvan de Putte, E. M., van der Sprenkel, E. E. B., & Nijhof, S. L. (2025) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/apa.70165
Self-citationKwak, Y., & Jung, M.-Y. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3591839
Ratnam, R., Jain, P., Kushwaha, R. A. S., Jain, A., Singh, U., & Kant, S. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.09.01.25334877
Similä, W. A., Halsteinli, V., Helland, I. B., Suvatne, C., Elmi, H., & Rø, T. B. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12441677
Lamm, T. T., Frostholm, L., & Pedersen, H. F. (2026) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2026.100953
Abio, A., Sourander, A., Dadras, O., Hinkka‐Yli‐Salomäki, S., Gilbert, S., & Ruuskanen, O. (2026) · Frontiers in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/frcha.2026.1745757
Jiang, X., Liu, J., Li, S., Pei, Q., & Huang, Q. (2026) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000050765
Metadata
- Authors
- Nijhof, S. L., Bleijenberg, G., Uiterwaal, C. S., Kimpen, J. L., & van de Putte, E. M.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Nijhof, Sanne L
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 379
- Issue
- 9824
- Pages
- 1412-1418
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2116645073
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 15.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Radboud Universiteit
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Keywords
- chronic fatigue syndrome, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, adolescents, FITNET, school attendance, fatigue severity, physical function, usual care comparison, web-based treatment
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Patient Compliance, Reference Values, Severity of Illness Index, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review