Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 936

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Suicide mortality in India: a nationally representative survey

Open access
Patel, Vikram, Ramasundarahettige, Chinthanie, Vijayakumar, Lakshmi, Thakur, JS, Gajalakshmi, Vendhan, Gururaj, Gopalkrishna, Suraweera, Wilson, Jha, Prabhat·2012·The Lancet

Abstract

Summary Background There are few epidemiological studies of suicide in India. Methods A nationally representative mortality survey determined the cause of death occurring in 1·1 million homes in 6671 small areas chosen randomly from all parts of India. Two trained physicians independently assigned codes to the causes of death, based on a nonmedical surveyor’s field interview with household respondents. Findings About 3% of deaths at ages 15 years and older (2684/95 335) were due to suicide. This corresponds to about 187 000 suicide deaths in India in 2010 at these ages (115 000 men and 72 000 women; age-standardised rates per 100 000 at ages 15 years and older of 26·3 for men and 17·5 for women). For suicide deaths at ages 15 years and older 40% percent of male suicides and 56% of female suicides occurred at ages 15–29 years. A 15 year old in India had an approximate cumulative risk of 1·3% of dying before age 80 years by suicide; men had higher risk (1·7%) than women (1·0%), with especially high risks in South India (3·5% among men and 1·8% among women). Suicide risks were higher in educated versus illiterate adults. About half of the suicides were from poisoning, much of which was pesticide. At ages 15–29 years, suicide accounted for nearly as many deaths as transport accidents in men and maternal deaths in women. Interpretation Suicide death rates in India are amongst the highest in the world. A large proportion of suicides occur at younger ages, especially in women. Much of Indian suicides may be avoidable, starting with control of access to pesticides. Funding U.S. National Institutes of Health

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60606-0

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 936

Metadata

Authors
Patel, V., Ramasundarahettige, C., Vijayakumar, L., Thakur, J., Gajalakshmi, V., Gururaj, G., Suraweera, W., & Jha, P.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
379
Issue
9834
Pages
2343-2351
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W1989509557
Cited by
936
References
53
FWCI
97.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Suicide mortality in India: a nationally representative survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60606-0
The paper
Patel, V., Ramasundarahettige, C., Vijayakumar, L., Thakur, J., Gajalakshmi, V., Gururaj, G., Suraweera, W., & Jha, P. (2012). Suicide mortality in India: a nationally representative survey. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60606-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.