Cited by 189Healthcare Quality and ManagementPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsHealth Policy Implementation Science

Promotion of improvement as a science

Open access
Marshall, Martin, Pronovost, Peter, Dixon-Woods, Mary·2013·The Lancet

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61850-9

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The explicit application of theory could shorten the time needed to develop improvement interventions.

    “In this article, we join others in arguing that the explicit application of theory could shorten the time needed to develop improvement interventions, optimise their design, identify conditions of context necessary for their success, and enhance learning from those efforts.4–9”

    From Demystifying theory and its use in improvement (2015) · cites this paper as [9]

  • The explicit application of theory could optimise the design of improvement interventions.

    “In this article, we join others in arguing that the explicit application of theory could shorten the time needed to develop improvement interventions, optimise their design, identify conditions of context necessary for their success, and enhance learning from those efforts.4–9”

    From Demystifying theory and its use in improvement (2015) · cites this paper as [9]

  • The explicit application of theory could enhance learning from improvement efforts.

    “In this article, we join others in arguing that the explicit application of theory could shorten the time needed to develop improvement interventions, optimise their design, identify conditions of context necessary for their success, and enhance learning from those efforts.4–9”

    From Demystifying theory and its use in improvement (2015) · cites this paper as [9]

  • The explicit application of theory could identify conditions of context necessary for the success of improvement interventions.

    “In this article, we join others in arguing that the explicit application of theory could shorten the time needed to develop improvement interventions, optimise their design, identify conditions of context necessary for their success, and enhance learning from those efforts.4–9”

    From Demystifying theory and its use in improvement (2015) · cites this paper as [9]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 348(26): 2635- 45.
  2. Lipitz-Snyderman A, Steinwachs D, Needham DM, Colantuoni E, Morlock LL, Pronovost PJ. Impact of a statewide intensive care unit quality improvement initiative on hospital mortality and length of stay: retrospective comparative analysis. BMJ 2011; 342: d219.
  3. McNamara RL, Wang Y, Herrin J, Curtis JP, Bradley EH, Magid DJ, et al. Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47(11): 2180-6.
  4. Bradley EH, Herrin J, Wang Y, Barton BA, Webster TR, Mattera JA, et al. Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2006; 355(22): 2308-20.
  5. Bradley EH, Curry LA, Webster TR, Mattera JA, Roumanis SA, Radford MJ, et al. Achieving Rapid Door-To-Balloon Times: How Top Hospitals Improve Complex Clinical Systems. Circulation 2006; 113(8): 1079-85.
  6. Bradley EH, Nallamothu BK, Herrin J, Ting HH, Stern AF, Nembhard IM, et al. National efforts to improve door-to-balloon time results from the Door-to-Balloon Alliance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54(25): 2423-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marshall, M., Pronovost, P., & Dixon-Woods, M.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Marshall, Martin
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
381
Issue
9864
Pages
419-421
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2038968272
Cited by
189
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7
FWCI
40.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (097899, 097899/A/11/Z)
  • National Institutes of Health (WT097899MF)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
quality improvement, quality of care, patient safety, avoidable harm, quality variation, resource utilization (health care), health care equity, health care governance
MeSH terms
Humans, Quality of Health Care, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review