Cited by 27Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchDisability Rights and RepresentationInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Introduction

Hatton, Chris, Emerson, Eric·2015·International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/bs.irrdd.2015.04.001

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hatton, C., & Emerson, E.
Affiliations
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Emerson, Eric
Venue
International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2015
Pages
1-9
ISSN
2211-6095 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1215488506
Cited by
27
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.28
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International review of research in developmental disabilities (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
intellectual disability, health disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review