The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy of a monovalent human-bovine (116E) rotavirus vaccine in Indian infants: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
Background Rotavirus is the most common cause of severe dehydrating gastroenteritis in developing countries. Safe, effective, and affordable rotavirus vaccines are needed for developing countries. Methods In a double-blind placebo controlled multicentre trial, 6799 infants aged 6 to 7 weeks were randomised to receive three doses of an oral human-bovine natural reassortant vaccine (116E) or placebo at ages 6, 10, and 14 weeks. Primary outcome was severe (≥11 on the Vesikari scale) rotavirus gastroenteritis. Efficacy outcomes and adverse events were ascertained through active surveillance. Findings At analyses, the median age was 17·2 months; over 96% subjects received all three doses of the vaccine/placebo and ~1% were lost to follow up. 4532 and 2267 subjects were randomly assigned to receive vaccine and placebo, respectively. The per protocol analyses included 4354 subjects in the vaccine and 2187 subjects in the placebo group. 71 events of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis were reported in 4752 person years among the vaccinees compared to 76 events in 2360 person years in the placebo recipients; vaccine efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis was 53·6% (95% CI 35·0–66·9; P<0·001) and 56·4% (95% CI 36·6–70·1; P <0·001) in the first year of life. The number of infants needed to be immunized to prevent one severe rotavirus gastroenteritis episode was 55 (95% CI 37–97). The incidence of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis/100 person years was 1·5 in vaccine and 3·2 in placebo group and an incidence rate ratio of 0·46 (95% CI 0·33–0·65). The absolute rate reduction for severe rotavirus gastroenteritis was 1·7 (95% CI 2·5–0·9). Efficacy against severe gastroenteritis of any aetiology was 18·6% (95% CI 1·9–32·3); it was 24·1% (95% CI 5·8–38·7) in the first year of life. The prevalence of immediate, solicited, and serious adverse events were similar in both groups. There were six cases of intussusception amongst 4532 vaccinees and two amongst 2267 placebo recipients (P=0·73). All intussusception cases occurred after the third dose. Among vaccine and placebo recipients, the minimum interval between dosing and intussusception was 112 and 36 days, respectively. Interpretation The monovalent human-bovine (116E) rotavirus vaccine is effective and well-tolerated in Indian infants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIAL
CLOPPER, C. J., & PEARSON, E. S. (1934) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/26.4.404 · Cited by 5,003
Kotloff, K. L., Nataro, J. P., Blackwelder, W. C., Nasrin, D., Farag, T. H., Panchalingam, S., Wu, Y., Sow, S. O., Sur, D., Breiman, R. F., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60844-2 · Cited by 3,560
Safety and Efficacy of a Pentavalent Human–Bovine (WC3) Reassortant Rotavirus Vaccine
Vesikari, T., Matson, D. O., Dennehy, P., Van Damme, P., Santosham, M., Rodriguez, Z., Dallas, M. J., Heyse, J. F., Goveia, M. G., Black, S. B., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa052664 · Cited by 1,873
Self-citationSafety and Efficacy of an Attenuated Vaccine against Severe Rotavirus Gastroenteritis
Ruiz-Palacios, G. M., Pérez-Schael, I., Velázquez, F. R., Abate, H., Breuer, T., Clemens, S. C., Cheuvart, B., Espinoza, F., Gillard, P., Innis, B. L., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa052434 · Cited by 1,799
Effect of Human Rotavirus Vaccine on Severe Diarrhea in African Infants
Madhi, S. A., Cunliffe, N. A., Steele, D., Witte, D., Kirsten, M., Louw, C., Ngwira, B., Victor, J. C., Gillard, P. H., Cheuvart, B. B., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0904797 · Cited by 886
Zaman, K., Anh, D. D., Victor, J. C., Shin, S., Yunus, M., Dallas, M. J., Podder, G., Thiem, V. D., Mai, L. T. P., Luby, S. P., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60755-6 · Cited by 824
Ruuska, T., & Vesikari, T. (1990) · Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3109/00365549009027046 · Cited by 714
Armah, G. E., Sow, S. O., Breiman, R. F., Dallas, M. J., Tapia, M. D., Feikin, D. R., Binka, F. N., Steele, A. D., Laserson, K. F., Ansah, N. A., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60889-6 · Cited by 654
Vesikari, T., Karvonen, A., Prymula, R., Schuster, V, Tejedor, J., Cohen, R., Meurice, F., Han, H., Damaso, S., & Bouckenooghe, A. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61744-9 · Cited by 636
Vaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use
Soares‐Weiser, K., MacLehose, H. G., Bergman, H., Ben‐Aharon, I., Nagpal, S., Goldberg, E., Pitan, F., & Cunliffe, N. A. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008521.pub3 · Cited by 381
Cited by
Crawford, S. E., Ramani, S., Tate, J. E., Parashar, U. D., Svensson, L., Hagbom, M., Franco, M. A., Greenberg, H. B., O'Ryan, M., Kang, G., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.83 · Cited by 687
Self-citationBányai, K., Estes, M. K., Martella, V., & Parashar, U. D. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31128-0 · Cited by 445
Ella, R., Vadrevu, K. M., Jogdand, H., Prasad, S., Reddy, S., Sarangi, V., Ganneru, B., Sapkal, G., Yadav, P., Abraham, P., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30942-7 · Cited by 424
Self-citationVaccines for preventing rotavirus diarrhoea: vaccines in use
Soares‐Weiser, K., MacLehose, H. G., Bergman, H., Ben‐Aharon, I., Nagpal, S., Goldberg, E., Pitan, F., & Cunliffe, N. A. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008521.pub3 · Cited by 381
Mokomane, M., Kasvosve, I., Melo, E. D., Pernica, J. M., & Goldfarb, D. M. (2018) · Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease · doi:10.1177/2049936117744429 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhandari, N., Rongsen-Chandola, T., Bavdekar, A., John, J., Antony, K., Taneja, S., Goyal, N., Kawade, A., Kang, G., Rathore, S. S., Juvekar, S., Muliyil, J., Arya, A., Shaikh, H., Abraham, V., Vrati, S., Proschan, M., Kohberger, R., Thiry, G., Glass, R., Greenberg, H. B., Curlin, G., Mohan, K., Harshavardhan, G. V. J. A., Prasad, S., Rao, T. S., Boslego, J., & Bhan, M. K.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 383
- Issue
- 9935
- Pages
- 2136-2143
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2101380815
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 24.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of a monovalent human-bovine (116E) rotavirus vaccine in Indian infants: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62630-6
- The paper
- Bhandari, N., Rongsen-Chandola, T., Bavdekar, A., John, J., Antony, K., Taneja, S., Goyal, N., Kawade, A., Kang, G., Rathore, S. S., Juvekar, S., Muliyil, J., Arya, A., Shaikh, H., Abraham, V., Vrati, S., Proschan, M., Kohberger, R., Thiry, G., . . . Bhan, M. K. (2014). Efficacy of a monovalent human-bovine (116E) rotavirus vaccine in Indian infants: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62630-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.