Cited by 8Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareInfant Development and Preterm CareNeonatal Respiratory Health Research

Neonatal and infant death: the Apgar score reassessed

Laptook, Abbot R·2014·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61305-2

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laptook, A. R.
Affiliations
Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island (US)
Corresponding author
Laptook, Abbot R
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
384
Issue
9956
Pages
1727-1728
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2049344353
Cited by
8
References
15
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
Keywords
Apgar score, neonatal mortality, infant mortality, neonatal resuscitation, low Apgar score, cause-specific mortality, neonatal assessment
MeSH terms
Apgar Score, Cause of Death, Female, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Premature, Male, Term Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review