Cited by 191Global Health and EpidemiologyInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementHealth and Conflict Studies

Measuring global health: motivation and evolution of the Global Burden of Disease Study

Murray, Christopher J L, Lopez, Alan D·2017·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32367-x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, C. J. L., & Lopez, A. D.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Murray, Christopher J L
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
390
Issue
10100
Pages
1460-1464
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2754056729
Cited by
191
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 1
FWCI
31.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Global Health and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
Keywords
Global Burden of Disease Study, disease burden estimation, mortality trends, disability-adjusted life years, risk factors, global health
MeSH terms
Global Burden of Disease, Data Collection, Forecasting, Humans, International Cooperation, Motivation, Global Health, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review