Editing the human genome: balancing safety and regulation
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
CRISPR Ethics: Moral Considerations for Applications of a Powerful Tool
Brokowski, C., & Adli, M. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2018.05.044 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lancet, T.
- Corresponding author
- The Lancet
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 391
- Issue
- 10119
- Pages
- 402
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W4241935729
- Semantic Scholar
- 4017afe1e504ced562f5c0647400d1b5495efccc
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 4
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
- Keywords
- human genome editing, CRISPR/Cas9, clinical trials, regulatory oversight, off-target mutations, in vivo gene editing, ex vivo gene editing, safety
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Safety, United States, Genome, Human, Government Regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
