The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, but the association with the concentration of specific biochemical markers is unclear. We aimed to quantify the adverse perinatal effects of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in women with increased serum bile acid concentrations and determine whether elevated bile acid concentrations were associated with the risk of stillbirth and preterm birth. METHODS: We did a systematic review by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases for studies published from database inception to June 1, 2018, reporting perinatal outcomes for women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy when serum bile acid concentrations were available. Inclusion criteria were studies defining intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy based upon pruritus and elevated serum bile acid concentrations, with or without raised liver aminotransferase concentrations. Eligible studies were case-control, cohort, and population-based studies, and randomised controlled trials, with at least 30 participants, and that reported bile acid concentrations and perinatal outcomes. Studies at potential higher risk of reporter bias were excluded, including case reports, studies not comprising cohorts, or successive cases seen in a unit; we also excluded studies with high risk of bias from groups selected (eg, a subgroup of babies with poor outcomes were explicitly excluded), conference abstracts, and Letters to the Editor without clear peer review. We also included unpublished data from two UK hospitals. We did a random effects meta-analysis to determine risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Aggregate data for maternal and perinatal outcomes were extracted from case-control studies, and individual patient data (IPD) were requested from study authors for all types of study (as no control group was required for the IPD analysis) to assess associations between biochemical markers and adverse outcomes using logistic and stepwise logistic regression. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42017069134. FINDINGS: =59·8%). In singleton pregnancies, stillbirth was associated with maximum total bile acid concentration (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC AUC]) 0·83 [95% CI 0·74-0·92]), but not alanine aminotransferase (ROC AUC 0·46 [0·35-0·57]). For singleton pregnancies, the prevalence of stillbirth was three (0·13%; 95% CI 0·02-0·38) of 2310 intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy cases in women with serum total bile acids of less than 40 μmol/L versus four (0·28%; 0·08-0·72) of 1412 cases with total bile acids of 40-99 μmol/L (hazard ratio [HR] 2·35 [95% CI 0·52-10·50]; p=0·26), and versus 18 (3·44%; 2·05-5·37) of 524 cases for bile acids of 100 μmol/L or more (HR 30·50 [8·83-105·30]; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: The risk of stillbirth is increased in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and singleton pregnancies when serum bile acids concentrations are of 100 μmol/L or more. Because most women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy have bile acids below this concentration, they can probably be reassured that the risk of stillbirth is similar to that of pregnant women in the general population, provided repeat bile acid testing is done until delivery. FUNDING: Tommy's, ICP Support, UK National Institute of Health Research, Wellcome Trust, and Genesis Research Trust.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17,633
Wan, X., Wang, W., Liu, J., & Tong, T. (2014) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-135 · Cited by 11,735
An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood
Saigal, S., & Doyle, L. W. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60136-1 · Cited by 2,818
Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Flenady, V., Koopmans, L., Middleton, P., Frøen, J. F., Smith, G. C., Gibbons, K., Coory, M., Gordon, A., Ellwood, D., McIntyre, H. D., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62233-7 · Cited by 1,247
Blencowe, H., Cousens, S., Jassir, F. B., Say, L., Chou, D., Mathers, C., Hogan, D., Shiekh, S., Qureshi, Z. U., You, D., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(15)00275-2 · Cited by 1,062
Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste.
Macleod, M. R., Michie, S., Roberts, I., Dirnagl, U., Chalmers, I., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Salman, R. A.-S., Chan, A.-W., & Glasziou, P. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62329-6 · Cited by 1,003
Glantz, A., Marschall, H.-U., & Mattsson, L.-Å. (2004) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.20336 · Cited by 844
Self-citationIntrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
Geenes, V., & Williamson, C. (2009) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.15.2049 · Cited by 675
Self-citationGeenes, V., Chappell, L. C., Seed, P. T., Steer, P. J., Knight, M., & Williamson, C. (2014) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.26617 · Cited by 479
Self-citationIntrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy
Williamson, C., & Geenes, V. (2014) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000000346 · Cited by 469
Self-citation
Cited by
Cauldwell, M., Mackie, F., Steer, P., Henehghan, M., Baalman, J., Brennand, J., Johnston, T., Dockree, S., Hedley, C., Jarvis, S., et al. (2020) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16119 · Cited by 46
Self-citationUrsodeoxycholic acid in pregnancy?
de Vries, E., & Beuers, U. (2019) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2019.08.020 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Ovadia, C., Seed, P. T., Sklavounos, A., Geenes, V., Di Ilio, C., Chambers, J., Kohari, K., Bacq, Y., Bozkurt, N., Brun-Furrer, R., Bull, L., Estiú, M. C., Grymowicz, M., Gunaydin, B., Hague, W. M., Haslinger, C., Hu, Y., Kawakita, T., Kebapcilar, A. G., Kebapcilar, L., Kondrackienė, J., Koster, M. P. H., Kowalska-Kańka, A., Kupčinskas, L., Lee, R. H., Locatelli, A., Macias, R. I. R., Marschall, H.-U., Oudijk, M. A., Raz, Y., Rimon, E., Shan, D., Shao, Y., Tribe, R., Tripodi, V., Yayla Abide, C., Yenidede, I., Thornton, J. G., Chappell, L. C., & Williamson, C.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 393
- Issue
- 10174
- Pages
- 899-909
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W2912839392
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 61.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31877-4
- The paper
- Ovadia, C., Seed, P. T., Sklavounos, A., Geenes, V., Di Ilio, C., Chambers, J., Kohari, K., Bacq, Y., Bozkurt, N., Brun-Furrer, R., Bull, L., Estiú, M. C., Grymowicz, M., Gunaydin, B., Hague, W. M., Haslinger, C., Hu, Y., Kawakita, T., Kebapcilar, A. G., . . . Williamson, C. (2019). Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31877-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.