Cited by 138Healthcare Policy and ManagementHealthcare Systems and ReformsHealthcare Systems and Practices

Improving the prognosis of health care in the USA

Open access
Galvani, Alison P, Parpia, Alyssa S, Foster, Eric M, Singer, Burton H, Fitzpatrick, Meagan C·2020·The Lancet

Abstract

Although health care expenditure per capita is higher in the USA than in any other country, more than 37 million Americans do not have health insurance, and 41 million more have inadequate access to care. Efforts are ongoing to repeal the Affordable Care Act which would exacerbate health-care inequities. By contrast, a universal system, such as that proposed in the Medicare for All Act, has the potential to transform the availability and efficiency of American health-care services. Taking into account both the costs of coverage expansion and the savings that would be achieved through the Medicare for All Act, we calculate that a single-payer, universal health-care system is likely to lead to a 13% savings in national health-care expenditure, equivalent to more than US$450 billion annually (based on the value of the US$ in 2017). The entire system could be funded with less financial outlay than is incurred by employers and households paying for health-care premiums combined with existing government allocations. This shift to single-payer health care would provide the greatest relief to lower-income households. Furthermore, we estimate that ensuring health-care access for all Americans would save more than 68 000 lives and 1·73 million life-years every year compared with the status quo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)33019-3

Cites

51 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oral health remains one of the most inequitable areas within healthcare.

    “yet it remains one of the most inequitable areas within healthcare (3, 4)”

    From Access to oral health care and its social determinants across the lifespan in the United States (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Expansion of coverage and services section discusses unequal healthcare access for uninsured and underinsured people, but does not address oral health or compare inequities across areas of healthcare. Searches for “oral,” “dental,” and the claim’s distinctive wording found no passage supporting the attributed point; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [5]Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development. OECD Health Statistics 2015. OECD. 2015. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/data/oecd-health-statistics_health-data-en.
  2. [21]Holahan J, Clemans-Cope L, Buettgens M, Favreault M, Blumberg LJ, Ndwandwe S. The Sanders single-payer health care plan. Urban Institute 2016. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Linda_Blumberg/publication/303826315_The_Sanders_Single-Payer_Health_Care_Plan_The_Effect_on_National_Health_Expenditures_and_Federal_and_Private_Spending/links/5756bb2e08ae5c654903d59b/The-Sanders-Single-Payer-Health-Care-Plan-The-Effect-on-National-Health-Expenditures-and-Federal-and-Private-Spending.pdf.
  3. [67]Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: Policies for Better Health and Quality of Care | READ online. OECD iLibrary. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/cardiovascular-disease-and-diabetes-policies-for-better-health-and-quality-of-care_9789264233010-en (accessed July 2, 2019).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galvani, A. P., Parpia, A. S., Foster, E. M., Singer, B. H., & Fitzpatrick, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Galvani, Alison P
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
395
Issue
10223
Pages
524-533
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3006668752
Cited by
138
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K01AI141576)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
Keywords
single-payer health care, Medicare for All, universal health care, health care expenditure, Affordable Care Act repeal, health insurance coverage, health care access, health care inequities, cost reduction, life-years gained, health policy, United States
MeSH terms
Universal Health Care, Delivery of Health Care, Health Expenditures, Medicare, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Prognosis, United States, Drug Costs, Cost Savings, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review