Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 232

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

COVID-19: a need for real-time monitoring of weekly excess deaths

Open access
Leon, David A, Shkolnikov, Vladimir M, Smeeth, Liam, Magnus, Per, Pechholdová, Markéta, Jarvis, Christopher I·2020·The Lancet

Abstract

The first-line epidemiological response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requires estimation of key parameters, including case fatality risk, and reproduction number, to monitor and predict the probable course of the pandemic. The challenge for public health scientists is that these data are partly a function of testing coverage. The number of deaths attributed to COVID-19 is problematic because the criteria for defining a death almost certainly depends on whether the death occurs in somebody who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30933-8

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 232

Metadata

Authors
Leon, D. A., Shkolnikov, V. M., Smeeth, L., Magnus, P., Pechholdová, M., & Jarvis, C. I.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
395
Issue
10234
Pages
e81
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3020619540
Cited by
232
References
0
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COVID-19: a need for real-time monitoring of weekly excess deaths. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30933-8
The paper
Leon, D. A., Shkolnikov, V. M., Smeeth, L., Magnus, P., Pechholdová, M., & Jarvis, C. I. (2020). COVID-19: a need for real-time monitoring of weekly excess deaths. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30933-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.