The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lopinavir–ritonavir in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Lopinavir-ritonavir has been proposed as a treatment for COVID-19 on the basis of in vitro activity, preclinical studies, and observational studies. Here, we report the results of a randomised trial to assess whether lopinavir-ritonavir improves outcomes in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. METHODS: In this randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial, a range of possible treatments was compared with usual care in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. The trial is underway at 176 hospitals in the UK. Eligible and consenting patients were randomly allocated to either usual standard of care alone or usual standard of care plus lopinavir-ritonavir (400 mg and 100 mg, respectively) by mouth for 10 days or until discharge (or one of the other RECOVERY treatment groups: hydroxychloroquine, dexamethasone, or azithromycin) using web-based simple (unstratified) randomisation with allocation concealment. Randomisation to usual care was twice that of any of the active treatment groups (eg, 2:1 in favour of usual care if the patient was eligible for only one active group, 2:1:1 if the patient was eligible for two active groups). The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis in all randomly assigned participants. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, 50189673, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04381936. FINDINGS: Between March 19, 2020, and June 29, 2020, 1616 patients were randomly allocated to receive lopinavir-ritonavir and 3424 patients to receive usual care. Overall, 374 (23%) patients allocated to lopinavir-ritonavir and 767 (22%) patients allocated to usual care died within 28 days (rate ratio 1·03, 95% CI 0·91-1·17; p=0·60). Results were consistent across all prespecified subgroups of patients. We observed no significant difference in time until discharge alive from hospital (median 11 days [IQR 5 to >28] in both groups) or the proportion of patients discharged from hospital alive within 28 days (rate ratio 0·98, 95% CI 0·91-1·05; p=0·53). Among patients not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline, there was no significant difference in the proportion who met the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilation or death (risk ratio 1·09, 95% CI 0·99-1·20; p=0·092). INTERPRETATION: In patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, lopinavir-ritonavir was not associated with reductions in 28-day mortality, duration of hospital stay, or risk of progressing to invasive mechanical ventilation or death. These findings do not support the use of lopinavir-ritonavir for treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19. FUNDING: Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19
The RECOVERY Collaborative Group (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2021436 · Cited by 11,477
Effect of Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 – Preliminary Report
Horby, P., Lim, W. S., Emberson, J., Mafham, M., Bell, J., Linsell, L., Staplin, N., Brightling, C., Ustianowski, A., Elmahi, E., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.22.20137273 · Cited by 11,475
Self-citationDocherty, A. B., Harrison, E. M., Green, C. A., Hardwick, H. E., Pius, R., Norman, L., Holden, K. A., Read, J. M., Dondelinger, F., Carson, G., et al. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m1985 · Cited by 3,481
Self-citation
Cited by
Abani, O., Abbas, A., Abbas, F., Abbas, M., Abbasi, S., Abbass, H., Abbott, A., Abdallah, N., Abdelaziz, A., Abdelfattah, M., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00676-0 · Cited by 1,983
Self-citationDrug treatments for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis
Siemieniuk, R. A., Bartoszko, J. J., Zeraatkar, D., Kum, E., Qasim, A., Díaz Martinez, J. P., Izcovich, A., Rochwerg, B., Lamontagne, F., Han, M. A., et al. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m2980 · Cited by 846
Ma, C., Tan, H., Choza, J., Wang, Y., & Wang, J. (2022) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2021.10.026 · Cited by 86
Nachega, J. B., Kapata, N., Sam-Agudu, N. A., Decloedt, E. H., Katoto, P. D. M. C., Nagu, T., Mwaba, P., Yeboah-Manu, D., Chanda-Kapata, P., Ntoumi, F., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.038 · Cited by 80
Viral sepsis: diagnosis, clinical features, pathogenesis, and clinical considerations
Xu, J.-Q., Zhang, W.-Y., Fu, J.-J., Fang, X.-Z., Gao, C.-G., Li, C., Yao, L., Li, Q.-L., Yang, X.-B., Ren, L.-H., et al. (2024) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40779-024-00581-0 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Horby, P. W., Mafham, M., Bell, J. L., Linsell, L., Staplin, N., Emberson, J., Palfreeman, A., Raw, J., Elmahi, E., Prudon, B., Green, C., Carley, S., Chadwick, D., Davies, M., Wise, M. P., Baillie, J. K., Chappell, L. C., Faust, S. N., Jaki, T., Jefferey, K., Lim, W. S., Montgomery, A., Rowan, K., Juszczak, E., Haynes, R., & Landray, M. J.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 396
- Issue
- 10259
- Pages
- 1345-1352
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W3090929175
- Cited by
- 709
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.