Cited by 536Healthcare Systems and PracticesLegal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 ChallengesPublic Health Policies and Education

Fragmented health systems in COVID-19: rectifying the misalignment between global health security and universal health coverage

Open access
Lal, Arush, Erondu, Ngozi A, Heymann, David L, Gitahi, Githinji, Yates, Robert·2021·The Lancet

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed enormous strain on countries around the world, exposing long-standing gaps in public health and exacerbating chronic inequities. Although research and analyses have attempted to draw important lessons on how to strengthen pandemic preparedness and response, few have examined the effect that fragmented governance for health has had on effectively mitigating the crisis. By assessing the ability of health systems to manage COVID-19 from the perspective of two key approaches to global health policy-global health security and universal health coverage-important lessons can be drawn for how to align varied priorities and objectives in strengthening health systems. This Health Policy paper compares three types of health systems (ie, with stronger investments in global health security, stronger investments in universal health coverage, and integrated investments in global health security and universal health coverage) in their response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and synthesises four essential recommendations (ie, integration, financing, resilience, and equity) to reimagine governance, policies, and investments for better health towards a more sustainable future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32228-5

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lal, A., Erondu, N. A., Heymann, D. L., Gitahi, G., & Yates, R.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • Chatham House (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Amref Health Africa (KE)
Corresponding author
Lal, Arush
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
397
Issue
10268
Pages
61-67
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3107523442
Cited by
536
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 2
FWCI
15.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, care fragmentation, global health security, universal health coverage, health governance, pandemic preparedness and response, health care financing, health system resilience, health equity, health system investment
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Global Health, Universal Health Insurance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review