Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 518

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial

Open access
Dawson, Jesse, Liu, Charles Y, Francisco, Gerard E, Cramer, Steven C, Wolf, Steven L, Dixit, Anand, Alexander, Jen, Ali, Rushna, Brown, Benjamin L, Feng, Wuwei, DeMark, Louis, Hochberg, Leigh R, Kautz, Steven A, Majid, Arshad, O'Dell, Michael W, Pierce, David, Prudente, Cecília N, Redgrave, Jessica, Turner, Duncan L, Engineer, Navzer D, Kimberley, Teresa J·2021·The Lancet

Abstract

Background: Long-term loss of arm function after ischaemic stroke is common and may be improved by Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation. Methods: In this pivotal, randomised, triple-blind, sham-controlled trial, we assigned participants with moderate to severe arm weakness, at least nine months after ischaemic stroke, to receive rehabilitation paired with active VNS or rehabilitation paired with sham stimulation (Control). All participants were implanted with a VNS device and received six weeks of in-clinic therapy followed by a home exercise program. The primary outcome was the change in impairment measured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score on the first day after completion of in-clinic therapy. All analyses were by intention to treat. The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03131960). Findings: We randomised 108 participants between Oct 2, 2017 and Sept 12, 2019 (53 to VNS and 55 to Control). A total of 106 completed the study. On the first day after completion of in-clinic therapy, the mean (±SD) FMA-UE score increased by 5.0 points (SD 4.4) in the VNS group and by 2.4 points (SD 3.8) in the Control group (p=0.001, between group difference 2.6, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.2). Ninety days later, a clinically meaningful response on the FMA-UE score was achieved in 47% with VNS versus 24% in controls (p=0.01; between group difference 24%, 95% CI 6 to 41%). The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) functional score increased by 0.46 (±0.40) points in the VNS group compared to 0.16 (±0.30) points in the Control group (p<0.0001, between group difference 0.30, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.43). The FMA-UE score increased by 5.8 points (±6.0) from baseline with VNS and by 2.8 points (±5.2) in controls (p=0.008, between group difference 2.96, 95% CI 0.83 to 5.08). There was one serious adverse event related to surgery (vocal cord paresis). Interpretation: Participants with moderate to severe arm impairment after ischaemic stroke showed clinically meaningful improvements in motor impairment and function with paired VNS compared to rehabilitation with sham VNS. Funding: The trial was funded by MicroTransponder Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00475-x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 518

Metadata

Authors
Dawson, J., Liu, C. Y., Francisco, G. E., Cramer, S. C., Wolf, S. L., Dixit, A., Alexander, J., Ali, R., Brown, B. L., Feng, W., DeMark, L., Hochberg, L. R., Kautz, S. A., Majid, A., O'Dell, M. W., Pierce, D., Prudente, C. N., Redgrave, J., Turner, D. L., Engineer, N. D., & Kimberley, T. J.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
397
Issue
10284
Pages
1545-1553
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3153909772
Cited by
518
References
39
FWCI
28.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00475-x
The paper
Dawson, J., Liu, C. Y., Francisco, G. E., Cramer, S. C., Wolf, S. L., Dixit, A., Alexander, J., Ali, R., Brown, B. L., Feng, W., DeMark, L., Hochberg, L. R., Kautz, S. A., Majid, A., O'Dell, M. W., Pierce, D., Prudente, C. N., Redgrave, J., Turner, D. L., . . . Kimberley, T. J. (2021). Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00475-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.