The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke
Open accessAbstract
Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) was developed to overcome upper limb impairments after stroke and is the most investigated intervention for treating stroke patients in the previous decades. This review describes the current evidence regarding: original CIMT and modified versions of CIMT (mCIMT). Meta-analysis showed strong evidence favoring both types of CIMT in terms of motor function, arm-hand activities and self-reported arm-hand functioning in daily life, immediately after treatment and at long-term follow-up, whereas no evidence was found for constraining alone (Forced Use (FU) therapy). No evidence was found that type of CIMT, intensity of practice or timing did affect outcome. Although the underlying mechanism that drive (m)CIMT is still poorly understood, recent kinematic conducted studies suggests that improvements introduced by original CIMT or mCIMT are mainly based on adaptation by learning to optimize the use of intact end-effectors by selecting patients with some voluntary motor control of wrist and finger extensors post stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feigin, V. L., Forouzanfar, M. H., Krishnamurthi, R., Mensah, G. A., Connor, M., Bennett, D. A., Moran, A. E., Sacco, R. L., Anderson, L., Truelsen, T., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61953-4 · Cited by 3,899
Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses
Deeks, J. J., Higgins, J. P. T., & Altman, D. G. (2008) · Cited by 2,782
Langhorne, P., Bernhardt, J., & Kwakkel, G. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60325-5 · Cited by 2,726
Self-citationMotor recovery after stroke: a systematic review
Langhorne, P., Coupar, F., & Pollock, A. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70150-4 · Cited by 2,319
Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour
Murphy, T. H., & Corbett, D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2735 · Cited by 1,938
Wolf, S. L., Winstein, C. J., Miller, J. P., Taub, E., Uswatte, G., Morris, D., Giuliani, C., Light, K. E., Nichols-Larsen, D., & EXCITE Investigators, F. T. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.17.2095 · Cited by 1,889
Self-citationAnalysing Data and Undertaking Meta‐Analyses
Deeks, J. J., Higgins, J. P., & Altman, D. G. (2008) · Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions · doi:10.1002/9780470712184.ch9 · Cited by 1,800
Meta-analysis of individual participant data: rationale, conduct, and reporting
Riley, R. D., Lambert, P. C., & Abo-Zaid, G. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c221 · Cited by 1,701
Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke.
Taub, E., Miller, N. E., Novack, T. A., Cook, E. W., Fleming, W. C., Nepomuceno, C., Connell, J., & Crago, J. E. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 1,557
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
Dwan, K., Altman, D. G., Arnaiz, J. A., Bloom, J., Chan, A.-W., Cronin, E., Decullier, E., Easterbrook, P. J., Von Elm, E., Gamble, C., et al. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003081 · Cited by 1,546
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Smania, 2007, Active finger extension: a simple movement predicting recovery of arm function in patients with acute stroke, Stroke, 38, 1088, 10.1161/01.STR.0000258077.88064.a3 · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000258077.88064.a3
- Hosomi, 2012, A modified method for constraint-induced movement therapy: a supervised self-training protocol, J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 21, 767, 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.04.004 · doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.04.004
Cited by
Kwakkel, G., Lannin, N. A., Borschmann, K., English, C., Ali, M., Churilov, L., Saposnik, G., Winstein, C., van Wegen, E. E., Wolf, S. L., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Stroke · doi:10.1177/1747493017711813 · Cited by 586
Self-citationDawson, J., Liu, C. Y., Francisco, G. E., Cramer, S. C., Wolf, S. L., Dixit, A., Alexander, J., Ali, R., Brown, B. L., Feng, W., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00475-x · Cited by 518
Self-citationDawson, J., Pierce, D., Dixit, A., Kimberley, T. J., Robertson, M., Tarver, B., Hilmi, O., McLean, J., Forbes, K., Kilgard, M. P., et al. (2016) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.115.010477 · Cited by 300
Maier, M., Rubio Ballester, B., Duff, A., Duarte Oller, E., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2019) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968318820169 · Cited by 239
Khazaal, W., Taliani, M., Boutros, C., Abou-Abbas, L., Hosseini, H., Salameh, P., & Sadier, N. S. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663267 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwakkel, G., Veerbeek, J. M., van Wegen, E. E. H., & Wolf, S. L.
- Venue
- The Lancet Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 224-234
- ISSN
- 1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045098731
- Cited by
- 591
- References
- 129
- FWCI
- 33.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70160-7
- The paper
- Kwakkel, G., Veerbeek, J. M., van Wegen, E. E. H., & Wolf, S. L. (2015). Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. The Lancet Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70160-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
