Cited by 179Sodium Intake and HealthHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementElectrolyte and hormonal disorders

Reduction of dietary sodium to less than 100 mmol in heart failure (SODIUM-HF): an international, open-label, randomised, controlled trial

Open access
Ezekowitz, Justin A, Colin-Ramirez, Eloisa, Ross, Heather, Escobedo, Jorge, Macdonald, Peter, Troughton, Richard, Saldarriaga, Clara, Alemayehu, Wendimagegn +48 more·2022·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Dietary restriction of sodium has been suggested to prevent fluid overload and adverse outcomes for patients with heart failure. We designed the Study of Dietary Intervention under 100 mmol in Heart Failure (SODIUM-HF) to test whether or not a reduction in dietary sodium reduces the incidence of future clinical events. Methods SODIUM-HF is an international, open-label, randomised, controlled trial that enrolled patients at 26 sites in six countries (Australia, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and New Zealand). Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class 2-3), and receiving optimally tolerated guideline-directed medical treatment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using a standard number generator and varying block sizes of two, four, or six, stratified by site, to either usual care according to local guidelines or a low sodium diet of less than 100 mmol (ie, <1500 mg/day). The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular-related admission to hospital, cardiovascular-related emergency department visit, or all-cause death within 12 months in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all randomly assigned patients). Safety was assessed in the ITT population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02012179, and is closed to accrual. Findings Between March 24, 2014, and Dec 9, 2020, 806 patients were randomly assigned to a low sodium diet (n=397) or usual care (n=409). Median age was 67 years (IQR 58-74) and 268 (33%) were women and 538 (66%) were men. Between baseline and 12 months, the median sodium intake decreased from 2286 mg/day (IQR 1653-3005) to 1658 mg/day (1301-2189) in the low sodium group and from 2119 mg/day (1673-2804) to 2073 mg/day (1541-2900) in the usual care group. By 12 months, events comprising the primary outcome had occurred in 60 (15%) of 397 patients in the low sodium diet group and 70 (17%) of 409 in the usual care group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·89 [95% CI 0·63-1·26]; p=0·53). All-cause death occurred in 22 (6%) patients in the low sodium diet group and 17 (4%) in the usual care group (HR 1·38 [0·73-2·60]; p=0·32), cardiovascular-related hospitalisation occurred in 40 (10%) patients in the low sodium diet group and 51 (12%) patients in the usual care group (HR 0·82 [0·54-1·24]; p=0·36), and cardiovascular-related emergency department visits occurred in 17 (4%) patients in the low sodium diet group and 15 (4%) patients in the usual care group (HR 1·21 [0·60-2·41]; p=0·60). No safety events related to the study treatment were reported in either group. Interpretation In ambulatory patients with heart failure, a dietary intervention to reduce sodium intake did not reduce clinical events. Funding Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the University Hospital Foundation, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, and Health Research Council of New Zealand.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00369-5

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ezekowitz, J. A., Colin-Ramirez, E., Ross, H., Escobedo, J., Macdonald, P., Troughton, R., Saldarriaga, C., Alemayehu, W., McAlister, F. A., Arcand, J., Atherton, J., Doughty, R., Gupta, M., Howlett, J., Jaffer, S., Lavoie, A., Lund, M., Marwick, T., McKelvie, R., Moe, G., Pandey, A. S., Porepa, L., Rajda, M., Rheault, H., Singh, J., Toma, M., Virani, S., Zieroth, S., Ezekowitz, J., Colin-Ramirez, E., Ross, H., Escobedo, J., Macdonald, P., Troughton, R., Saldarriaga, C., Alemayehu, W., McAlister, F., Arcand, J., Atherton, J., Doughty, R., Gupta, M., Howlett, J., Jaffer, S., Lavoie, A., Lund, M., Marwick, T., McKelvie, R., Moe, G., Pandey, A. S., Porepa, L., Rajda, M., Rheault, H., Singh, J., Toma, M., Virani, S., & Zieroth, S.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
399
Issue
10333
Pages
1391-1400
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W4223420375
Cited by
179
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 22
FWCI
23.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2022-10-08)
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
Keywords
dietary sodium restriction, sodium restriction, chronic heart failure, sodium intake, cardiovascular hospitalization, all-cause mortality, fluid overload, heart failure exacerbation, secondary prevention
MeSH terms
Aged, Canada, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Sodium, Sodium, Dietary, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review