The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lisocabtagene maraleucel versus standard of care with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as second-line treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (TRANSFORM): results from an interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) primary refractory to or relapsed within 12 months of first-line therapy are at high risk for poor outcomes with current standard of care, platinum-based salvage immunochemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), an autologous, CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has previously demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety in third-line or later LBCL. In this Article, we report a prespecified interim analysis of liso-cel versus standard of care as second-line treatment for primary refractory or early relapsed (within 12 months after response to initial therapy) LBCL. METHODS TRANSFORM is a global, phase 3 study, conducted in 47 sites in the USA, Europe, and Japan, comparing liso-cel with standard of care as second-line therapy in patients with primary refractory or early (≤12 months) relapsed LBCL. Adults aged 18-75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 1 or less, adequate organ function, PET-positive disease per Lugano 2014 criteria, and candidates for autologous HSCT were randomly assigned (1:1), by use of interactive response technology, to liso-cel (100 × 106 CAR+ T cells intravenously) or standard of care. Standard of care consisted of three cycles of salvage immunochemotherapy delivered intravenously-R-DHAP (rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, two infusions of cytarabine 2000 mg/m2 on day 2, and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1), R-ICE (rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1, ifosfamide 5000 mg/m2 on day 2, etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1-3, and carboplatin area under the curve 5 [maximum dose of 800 mg] on day 2), or R-GDP (rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1)-followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT in responders. Primary endpoint was event-free survival, with response assessments by an independent review committee per Lugano 2014 criteria. Efficacy was assessed per intention-to-treat (ie, all randomly assigned patients) and safety in patients who received any treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03575351, and is ongoing. FINDINGS Between Oct 23, 2018, and Dec 8, 2020, 232 patients were screened and 184 were assigned to the liso-cel (n=92) or standard of care (n=92) groups. At the data cutoff for this interim analysis, March 8, 2021, the median follow-up was 6·2 months (IQR 4·4-11·5). Median event-free survival was significantly improved in the liso-cel group (10·1 months [95% CI 6·1-not reached]) compared with the standard-of-care group (2·3 months [2·2-4·3]; stratified hazard ratio 0·35; 95% CI 0·23-0·53; stratified Cox proportional hazards model one-sided p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (74 [80%] of 92 patients in the liso-cel group vs 46 [51%] of 91 patients in the standard-of-care group), anaemia (45 [49%] vs 45 [49%]), thrombocytopenia (45 [49%] vs 58 [64%]), and prolonged cytopenia (40 [43%] vs three [3%]). Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events, which are associated with CAR T-cell therapy, occurred in one (1%) and four (4%) of 92 patients in the liso-cel group, respectively (no grade 4 or 5 events). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 44 (48%) patients in the liso-cel group and 44 (48%) in the standard-of-care group. No new liso-cel safety concerns were identified in the second-line setting. There were no treatment-related deaths in the liso-cel group and one treatment-related death due to sepsis in the standard-of-care group. INTERPRETATION These results support liso-cel as a new second-line treatment recommendation in patients with early relapsed or refractory LBCL. FUNDING Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms
Swerdlow, S. H., Campo, E., Pileri, S. A., Harris, N. L., Stein, H., Siebert, R., Advani, R., Ghielmini, M., Salles, G. A., Zelenetz, A. D., et al. (2016) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2016-01-643569 · Cited by 7,831
Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome.
Lee, D. W., Gardner, R., Porter, D. L., Louis, C. U., Ahmed, N., Jensen, M., Grupp, S. A., & Mackall, C. L. (2014) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2014-05-552729 · Cited by 2,806
Abramson, J. S., Palomba, M. L., Gordon, L. I., Lunning, M. A., Wang, M., Arnason, J., Mehta, A., Purev, E., Maloney, D. G., Andreadis, C., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31366-0 · Cited by 2,430
Self-citationAxicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy for Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Locke, F. L., Miklos, D. B., Jacobson, C. A., Perales, M.-A., Kersten, M.-J., Oluwole, O. O., Ghobadi, A., Rapoport, A. P., McGuirk, J., Pagel, J. M., et al. (2022) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2116133 · Cited by 1,607
Cited by
Long-term outcomes following CAR T cell therapy: what we know so far
Cappell, K. M., & Kochenderfer, J. N. (2023) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-023-00754-1 · Cited by 1,382
Clinical implications of T cell exhaustion for cancer immunotherapy
Chow, A., Perica, K., Klebanoff, C. A., & Wolchok, J. D. (2022) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-022-00689-z · Cited by 1,044
Abramson, J. S., Solomon, S. R., Arnason, J., Johnston, P. B., Glass, B., Bachanova, V., Ibrahimi, S., Mielke, S., Mutsaers, P., Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, F., et al. (2023) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2022018730 · Cited by 399
Self-citationPromises and challenges of a decentralized CAR T-cell manufacturing model
Shah, M., Krull, A., Odonnell, L., de Lima, M. J., & Bezerra, E. (2023) · Frontiers in Transplantation · doi:10.3389/frtra.2023.1238535 · Cited by 77
Current landscape of innovative drug development and regulatory support in China
Tan, R., Hua, H., Zhou, S., Yang, Z., Yang, C., Huang, G., Zeng, J., & Zhao, J. (2025) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-025-02267-y · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamdar, M., Solomon, S. R., Arnason, J., Johnston, P. B., Glass, B., Bachanova, V., Ibrahimi, S., Mielke, S., Mutsaers, P., Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, F., Izutsu, K., Morschhauser, F., Lunning, M., Maloney, D. G., Crotta, A., Montheard, S., Previtali, A., Stepan, L., Ogasawara, K., Mack, T., & Abramson, J. S.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 399
- Issue
- 10343
- Pages
- 2294-2308
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W4283023614
- Cited by
- 799
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 61.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lisocabtagene maraleucel versus standard of care with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as second-line treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (TRANSFORM): results from an interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00662-6
- The paper
- Kamdar, M., Solomon, S. R., Arnason, J., Johnston, P. B., Glass, B., Bachanova, V., Ibrahimi, S., Mielke, S., Mutsaers, P., Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, F., Izutsu, K., Morschhauser, F., Lunning, M., Maloney, D. G., Crotta, A., Montheard, S., Previtali, A., Stepan, L., Ogasawara, K., . . . Abramson, J. S. (2022). Lisocabtagene maraleucel versus standard of care with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as second-line treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (TRANSFORM): results from an interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00662-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.