Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 474

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The scope of the antimicrobial resistance challenge

Open access
Okeke, Iruka N, de Kraker, Marlieke E A, Van Boeckel, Thomas P, Kumar, Chirag K, Schmitt, Heike, Gales, Ana C, Bertagnolio, Silvia, Sharland, Mike, Laxminarayan, Ramanan·2024·The Lancet

Abstract

Each year, an estimated 7·7 million deaths are attributed to bacterial infections, of which 4.95 million are associated with drug-resistant pathogens, and 1·27 million are caused by bacterial pathogens resistant to the antibiotics available. Access to effective antibiotics when indicated prolongs life, reduces disability, reduces health-care expenses, and enables access to other life-saving medical innovations. Antimicrobial resistance undoes these benefits and is a major barrier to attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals, including targets for newborn survival, progress on healthy ageing, and alleviation of poverty. Adverse consequences from antimicrobial resistance are seen across the human life course in both health-care-associated and community-associated infections, as well as in animals and the food chain. The small set of effective antibiotics has narrowed, especially in resource-poor settings, and people who are very young, very old, and severely ill are particularly susceptible to resistant infections. This paper, the first in a Series on the challenge of antimicrobial resistance, considers the global scope of the problem and how it should be measured. Robust and actionable data are needed to drive changes and inform effective interventions to contain resistance. Surveillance must cover all geographical regions, minimise biases towards hospital-derived data, and include non-human niches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00876-6

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 101 references

Cited by

See all 474

Metadata

Authors
Okeke, I. N., de Kraker, M. E. A., Van Boeckel, T. P., Kumar, C. K., Schmitt, H., Gales, A. C., Bertagnolio, S., Sharland, M., & Laxminarayan, R.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
403
Issue
10442
Pages
2426-2438
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W4398244712
Cited by
474
References
101
FWCI
91.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The scope of the antimicrobial resistance challenge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00876-6
The paper
Okeke, I. N., de Kraker, M. E. A., Van Boeckel, T. P., Kumar, C. K., Schmitt, H., Gales, A. C., Bertagnolio, S., Sharland, M., & Laxminarayan, R. (2024). The scope of the antimicrobial resistance challenge. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00876-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.