Cited by 4Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchHead and Neck Cancer StudiesGenital Health and Disease

The rational design of cervical cancer prevention strategies

Schiffman, Mark, de Sanjose, Silvia·2024·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01547-2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schiffman, M., & de Sanjose, S.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Schiffman, Mark
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
404
Issue
10451
Pages
406-407
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W4401205721
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute Cancer Moonshot
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
Keywords
cervical cancer prevention, human papillomavirus, high-risk HPV, prevention, rational design
MeSH terms
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Papillomavirus Infections, Papillomavirus Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review