Cited by 23Coffee research and impactsAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Coffee-drinking and myocardial infarction

Mann, J.I., Thorogood, M.·1975·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92711-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The higher risk estimates from individual case-control studies may have resulted from a combination of bias in control selection, recall bias, or confounding by cigarette smoking.

    “The higher risk estimates from individual case- control studies may have resulted from a combination of bias in control selection30 35; recall bias; or be confounded by cigarette smoking3033 35;”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mann, J. I., & Thorogood, M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1975-12
Volume
306
Issue
7946
Pages
1215
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2084544231
Cited by
23
References
4
Citations by year
2015: 1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
coffee consumption, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Coffee, Drinking, Female, Humans, Myocardial Infarction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review