The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DOUBLE-BLIND MULTICENTRE COMPARISON OF OMEPRAZOLE AND RANITIDINE IN THE TREATMENT OF REFLUX OESOPHAGITIS
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Practical Nonparametric Statistics
Groggel, D. J. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.2000.10486067 · Cited by 11,041
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions.
Everitt, B. S., & Fleiss, J. L. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530193 · Cited by 8,990
Practical Non-Parametric Statistics.
Brown, B. M., & Conover, W. J. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530578 · Cited by 2,394
Lind, T., Cederberg, C., Ekenved, G., Haglund, U., & Olbe, L. (1983) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.24.4.270 · Cited by 501
Optimal dose of oral omeprazole for maximal 24 hour decrease of intragastric acidity.
Sharma, B. K., Walt, R. P., Pounder, R. E., Gomes, M. D., Wood, E. C., & Logan, L. H. (1984) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.25.9.957 · Cited by 240
Effect of Omeprazole and Cimetidine on Duodenal Ulcer: A Double-Blind Comparative Trial
Lauritsen, K., Rune, S. J., Bytzer, P., Kelbaek, H., Jensen, K. G., Rask-Madsen, J., Bendtsen, F., Linde, J., Højlund, M., Andersen, H. H., et al. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198504113121505 · Cited by 188
A Comparison of Two Different Doses of Omeprazole Versus Ranitidine in Treatment of Duodenal Ulcers
Bardhan, K. D., Porro, G. B., Bose, K., Daly, M. J., Hinchliffe, R. F., Jonsson, E. W., Lazzaroni, M., Næsdal, J., Rikner, L., & Walan, A. (1986) · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/00004836-198608000-00005 · Cited by 153
Omeprazole: Effective, Convenient Therapy for Zollinger—Ellison Syndrome
McArthur, K. E., Collen, M. J., Maron, P. N., et al. (1985) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(85)80011-1 · Cited by 139
Cited by
Koufman, J. A. (1991) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.1991.101.s53.1 · Cited by 1,647
Identification of Human Liver Cytochrome P450 Isoforms Mediating Omeprazole Metabolism
ANDERSSON, T., MINERS, J. O., VERONESE, M. E., TASSANEEYAKUL, W., TASSANEEYAKUL, W., MEYER, U. A., & BIRKETT, D. J. (1993) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb00410.x · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Klinkenberg-Knol, E. C., Festen, H. P. M., Jansen, J. M. B. J., Meuwissen, S. G. M., & Lamers, C. B. H. W.
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-02
- Volume
- 329
- Issue
- 8529
- Pages
- 349-351
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W1985499927
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 34.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DOUBLE-BLIND MULTICENTRE COMPARISON OF OMEPRAZOLE AND RANITIDINE IN THE TREATMENT OF REFLUX OESOPHAGITIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91726-0
- The paper
- Klinkenberg-Knol, E. C., Festen, H. P. M., Jansen, J. M. B. J., Meuwissen, S. G. M., & Lamers, C. B. H. W. (1987). DOUBLE-BLIND MULTICENTRE COMPARISON OF OMEPRAZOLE AND RANITIDINE IN THE TREATMENT OF REFLUX OESOPHAGITIS. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91726-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
