Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of Omeprazole and Cimetidine on Duodenal Ulcer: A Double-Blind Comparative Trial

Lauritsen, Karsten, Rune, Simon J., Bytzer, Peter, Kelbaek, Henning, Jensen, Kaj Gotlieb, Rask-Madsen, Jørgen, Bendtsen, Flemming, Linde, Jøorgen, Højlund, Magnus, Andersen, Hans Harrestrup, Møllmann, Knud-Mogens, Nissen, Verner R., Ovesen, Lars, Schlichting, Poul, Tage-Jensen, Ulrik, Wulff, Henrik R.·1985·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

We conducted a double-blind randomized study of 132 patients to determine whether the new, investigational proton-pump inhibitor, omeprazole (30 mg per day), would accelerate healing and pain relief, as compared with cimetidine (1 g per day), in patients with duodenal ulcer. After two weeks of treatment, which was completed by all patients, the healing rates were 73 per cent in the omeprazole group and 46 per cent in the cimetidine group (P less than 0.01). After four weeks of treatment, which was completed by 118 patients, the corresponding figures were 92 and 74 per cent (P less than 0.05). In the omeprazole group 55 per cent of the patients were free of pain after the first week, as compared with 40 per cent of those treated with cimetidine (P greater than 0.05). No major clinical or biochemical side effects of omeprazole or cimetidine were noted. A six-month follow-up study revealed no significant difference between the recurrence rates after omeprazole and after cimetidine treatment. In May 1984 clinical trials with omeprazole were temporarily suspended, since a study of long-term toxicity in rats had shown the development of gastric carcinoid tumors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm198504113121505

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lauritsen, K., Rune, S. J., Bytzer, P., Kelbaek, H., Jensen, K. G., Rask-Madsen, J., Bendtsen, F., Linde, J., Højlund, M., Andersen, H. H., Møllmann, K.-M., Nissen, V. R., Ovesen, L., Schlichting, P., Tage-Jensen, U., & Wulff, H. R.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1985-04-11
Volume
312
Issue
15
Pages
958-961
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2047644905
Cited by
188
References
0
FWCI
32.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Omeprazole and Cimetidine on Duodenal Ulcer: A Double-Blind Comparative Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm198504113121505
The paper
Lauritsen, K., Rune, S. J., Bytzer, P., Kelbaek, H., Jensen, K. G., Rask-Madsen, J., Bendtsen, F., Linde, J., Højlund, M., Andersen, H. H., Møllmann, K.-M., Nissen, V. R., Ovesen, L., Schlichting, P., Tage-Jensen, U., & Wulff, H. R. (1985). Effect of Omeprazole and Cimetidine on Duodenal Ulcer: A Double-Blind Comparative Trial. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198504113121505

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.