Cited by 579BRCA gene mutations in cancerBreast Lesions and CarcinomasBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Pathology of familial breast cancer: differences between breast cancers in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and sporadic cases

Stratton, Michael R·1997·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)10109-4

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stratton, M. R.
Corresponding author
Stratton, Michael R
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-05
Volume
349
Issue
9064
Pages
1505-1510
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2160459637
Cited by
579
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
23.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Lancet (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Liverpool
  • KWF Kankerbestrijding
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
hereditary breast cancer, BRCA1 mutation, BRCA2 mutation, breast cancer histopathology, tumor grade, medullary carcinoma, atypical medullary carcinoma, tubular carcinoma, ductal carcinoma in situ, lobular carcinoma in situ, invasive lobular carcinoma, invasive ductal carcinoma, pleomorphism, mitotic count, tubule formation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review