Cited by 707BRCA gene mutations in cancerBreast Lesions and CarcinomasBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Multifactorial Analysis of Differences Between Sporadic Breast Cancers and Cancers Involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations

Lakhani, S. R., Jacquemier, J., Sloane, J. P., Gusterson, B. A., Anderson, T. J., van de Vijver, M. J., Farid, L. M., Venter, D. +33 more·1998·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have previously demonstrated that breast cancers associated with inherited BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations differ from each other in their histopathologic appearances and that each of these types differs from breast cancers in patients unselected for family history (i.e., sporadic cancers). We have now conducted a more detailed examination of cytologic and architectural features of these tumors. METHODS: Specimens of tumor tissue (5-microm-thick sections) were examined independently by two pathologists, who were unaware of the case or control subject status, for the presence of cell mitosis, lymphocytic infiltration, continuous pushing margins, and solid sheets of cancer cells; cell nuclei, cell nucleoli, cell necrosis, and cell borders were also evaluated. The resulting data were combined with previously available information on tumor type and tumor grade and further evaluated by multifactorial analysis. All statistical tests are two-sided. RESULTS: Cancers associated with BRCA1 mutations exhibited higher mitotic counts (P = .001), a greater proportion of the tumor with a continuous pushing margin (P<.0001), and more lymphocytic infiltration (P = .002) than sporadic (i.e., control) cancers. Cancers associated with BRCA2 mutations exhibited a higher score for tubule formation (fewer tubules) (P = .0002), a higher proportion of the tumor perimeter with a continuous pushing margin (P<.0001), and a lower mitotic count (P = .003) than control cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has identified key features of the histologic phenotypes of breast cancers in carriers of mutant BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. This information may improve the classification of breast cancers in individuals with a family history of the disease and may ultimately aid in the clinical management of patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/90.15.1138

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lakhani, S. R., Jacquemier, J., Sloane, J. P., Gusterson, B. A., Anderson, T. J., van de Vijver, M. J., Farid, L. M., Venter, D., Antoniou, A., Storfer-Isser, A., Smyth, E., Steel, C. M., Haites, N., Scott, Goldgar, D., Neuhausen, S., Daly, P. A., Ormiston, W., McManus, R., Scherneck, S., Ponder, B. A. J., Ford, D., Peto, J., Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Bignon, Y.-J., Struewing, J. P., Spurr, N. K., Bishop, D. T., Klijn, J. G. M., Devilee, P., Cornelisse, C. J., Lasset, C., Lenoir, G., Barkardottir, R. B., Egilsson, V., Hamann, U., Chang-Claude, J., Sobol, H., Weber, B., Stratton, M. R., & Easton, D. F.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Institute of Cancer Research (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Western General Hospital (GB)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • Max Delbrück Center (DE)
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
  • Centre Jean Perrin (FR)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • St James's University Hospital (GB)
  • Daniel den Hoed Kliniek (NL)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Lakhani, S. R.
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
1998-08-05
Volume
90
Issue
15
Pages
1138-1145
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2112187879
Cited by
707
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 28
FWCI
18.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7r01ca061231-03)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-61231)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
breast cancer, BRCA1 mutation, BRCA2 mutation, hereditary breast cancer, sporadic breast cancer, tumor histology, mitotic count, lymphocyte infiltration, tubule formation, tumor grade, family history (medicine)
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Proteins, Transcription Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Genes, BRCA1, BRCA2 Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review