Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 530

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The cost of treating community-acquired pneumonia

Open access
Niederman, Michael S., McCombs, Jeffrey S., Unger, Alan N., Kumar, Amit, Popovian, Robert·1998·Clinical Therapeutics

Abstract

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is responsible for an average of 4.5 million visits annually to physicians' offices, emergency departments, and outpatient clinics. However, there have been few studies using national data on the costs of treating CAP. Without such data, it is difficult to assess whether new therapies and treatment strategies are needed to improve patient outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis based on national incidence data and paid claims data for patients treated for CAP to assess the frequency of services rendered and costs to the health-care system. Records were selected for the study based on a primary diagnosis of CAP according to the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision. Incidence data were derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Medicare was the primary source of data for patients aged > or =65 years. Data from the National Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey were used to determine the cost of treating patients aged <65 years. We arrived at a total cost of $4.8 billion for treating patients aged > or =65 years and $3.6 billion for treating patients aged <65 years. These calculations were based on the following: 1.1 million hospital discharges resulting in inpatient costs of $4.4 billion (52.4% of the $8.4 billion) for the 0.6 million patients aged > or =65 years and $3.1 billion (36.9% of the $8.4 billion) for the 0.5 million patients aged <65 years. The average hospital length of stay was 7.8 days with an average cost of $7166 for patients aged > or =65 years and 5.8 days with an average cost of $6042 for younger patients. Room and board represented the largest percentage of the average hospital bill for patients with CAP. Inpatient physician service costs were $305 million and $192 million for the > or =65 and <65 groups, respectively. Based on 1.1 million outpatient office visits for those aged > or =65 years and 3.3 million visits for those aged <65, total outpatient costs were $119 million and $266 million, respectively. Given the overwhelming cost burden for CAP in the hospital setting, any new therapy that allows patients to be treated in the outpatient setting could result in significant savings, especially for patients aged > or =65 years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80144-6

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 530

Metadata

Authors
Niederman, M. S., McCombs, J. S., Unger, A. N., Kumar, A., & Popovian, R.
Venue
Clinical Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-07
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
820-837
ISSN
0149-2918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050343982
Cited by
530
References
0
FWCI
11.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The cost of treating community-acquired pneumonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80144-6
The paper
Niederman, M. S., McCombs, J. S., Unger, A. N., Kumar, A., & Popovian, R. (1998). The cost of treating community-acquired pneumonia. Clinical Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2918(98)80144-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.