Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 738

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Logic models: a tool for telling your programs performance story

McLaughlin, John A., Jordan, Gretchen B.·1999·Evaluation and Program Planning

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0149-7189(98)00042-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • The functions of program theory

    Bickman, L. (1987) · New Directions for Program Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.1443 · Cited by 347 · cited 1×

    “A Logic Model presents a plausible and sensible model of how the program will work under certain conditions to solve identified problems (Bickman, 1987).”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 738

Metadata

Authors
McLaughlin, J. A., & Jordan, G. B.
Venue
Evaluation and Program Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
65-72
ISSN
0149-7189 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105941026
Cited by
738
References
1
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Logic models: a tool for telling your programs performance story. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0149-7189(98)00042-1
The paper
McLaughlin, J. A., & Jordan, G. B. (1999). Logic models: a tool for telling your programs performance story. Evaluation and Program Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-7189(98)00042-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.