Cited by 1,020Diverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementHospitality and Tourism Education

Tourism motivation and expectation formation

Gnoth, Juergen·1997·Annals of Tourism Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0160-7383(97)80002-3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gnoth, J.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Gnoth, Juergen
Venue
Annals of Tourism Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-01
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
283-304
ISSN
0160-7383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998131986
Cited by
1,020
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 50
FWCI
26.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annals of Tourism Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Hospitality and Tourism Education
Keywords
tourist motivation, expectations formation, drive reduction, tourist attitudes, tourist values, tourist product design, tourism resource management, substitutes, tourist satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review