The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Very high-frequency ultrasound corneal analysis identifies anatomic correlates of optical complications of lamellar refractive surgery
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the utility of very high-frequency (VHF) ultrasound scanning in determining the anatomic changes and correlates of optical complications in lamellar refractive surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. PARTICIPANTS: Cases analyzed included marked asymmetric astigmatism postautomated lamellar keratoplasty (ALK), image ghosting despite normal videokeratography post-ALK, uncomplicated myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and hyperopic LASIK with regression. METHODS: A prototype VHF ultrasound scanner (50 MHz) was used to obtain sequences of parallel B-scans of the cornea. Digital signal processing techniques were used to measure epithelial, stromal, and flap thickness values in a grid encompassing the central 4 to 5 mm of the cornea, enabling pachymetric mapping of each layer with 2-micron precision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The appearance of the corneas in VHF ultrasound images and thickness values of individual corneal layers determined from VHF ultrasound data. RESULTS: VHF ultrasound resolved the epithelial, stromal cap, or flap and residual stromal layers 1 year after lamellar surgery. Asymmetric stromal tissue removal was differentiated from stromal cap irregularity. Epithelium acted to compensate for asymmetry of the stromal surface about the visual axis and for localized surface irregularities. Irregularities in the epithelial-stromal interface accounted for image ghosting present despite apparently normal videokeratography. Epithelial thickening was shown after uncomplicated myopic LASIK. Hyperopic LASIK demonstrated relative epithelial thickening localized to the region of ablation accounting for refractive regression. CONCLUSIONS: VHF ultrasound shows promise as a sensitive method of determining the anatomic correlates of optical complications in lamellar refractive surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy
Sugar, A., Rapuano, C. J., Culbertson, W. W., Huang, D., Varley, G. A., Agapitos, P. J., de Luise, V. P., & Koch, D. D. (2002) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00966-6 · Cited by 408
Reinstein, D. Z., Archer, T. J., Gobbe, M., Silverman, R. H., & Coleman, D. J. (2008) · Journal of Refractive Surgery · doi:10.3928/1081597x-20080601-05 · Cited by 379
Self-citationNovel Pachymetric Parameters Based on Corneal Tomography for Diagnosing Keratoconus
Ambrósio, R., Caiado, A. L. C., Guerra, F. P., Louzada, R., Roy, A. S., Luz, A., Dupps, W. J., & Belin, M. W. (2011) · Journal of Refractive Surgery · doi:10.3928/1081597x-20110721-01 · Cited by 349
Keeping an Eye on Decellularized Corneas: A Review of Methods, Characterization and Applications
Wilson, S., Sidney, L., Dunphy, S., Rose, J., & Hopkinson, A. (2013) · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · doi:10.3390/jfb4030114 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Reinstein, D. Z., Silverman, R. H., Sutton, H. F. S., & Coleman, D. J.
- Venue
- Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 474-482
- ISSN
- 0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086313367
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Very high-frequency ultrasound corneal analysis identifies anatomic correlates of optical complications of lamellar refractive surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90105-7
- The paper
- Reinstein, D. Z., Silverman, R. H., Sutton, H. F. S., & Coleman, D. J. (1999). Very high-frequency ultrasound corneal analysis identifies anatomic correlates of optical complications of lamellar refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90105-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.