Cited by 379Corneal surgery and disordersOcular Surface and Contact LensOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

Epithelial Thickness in the Normal Cornea: Three-dimensional Display With Artemis Very High-frequency Digital Ultrasound

Open access
Reinstein, Dan Z., Archer, Timothy J., Gobbe, Marine, Silverman, Ronald H., Coleman, D. Jackson·2008·Journal of Refractive Surgery

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize the in vivo epithelial thickness profile in a population of normal eyes. Methods: An epithelial thickness profile was measured by Artemis 1 (ArcScan Inc) very high-frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound scanning across the central 10-mm diameter of the cornea of 110 eyes of 56 patients who presented for refractive surgery assessment. The average, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and range of epithelial thickness were calculated for each point in the 10×10-mm Cartesian matrix and plotted. Differences between the epithelial thickness at the corneal vertex and peripheral locations at the 3-mm radius were calculated. The location of the thinnest epithelium was found for each eye and averaged. Correlations of corneal vertex epithelial thickness with age, spherical equivalent refraction, and average keratometry were calculated. Results: The mean epithelial thickness at the corneal vertex was 53.4±4.6 µ m, with no statistically significant difference between right and left eyes, and no significant differences in age, spherical equivalent refraction, or keratometry. The average epithelial thickness map showed that the corneal epithelium was thicker inferiorly than superiorly (5.9 µm at the 3-mm radius, P <.001) and thicker nasally than temporally (1.3 µm at the 3-mm radius, P <.001). The location of the thinnest epithelium was displaced on average 0.33 mm temporally and 0.90 mm superiorly with reference to the corneal vertex. Conclusions: Three-dimensional thickness mapping of the corneal epithelium demonstrated that the epithelial thickness is not evenly distributed across the cornea; the epithelium was significantly thicker inferiorly than superiorly and significantly thicker nasally than temporally with a larger inferosuperior difference than nasotemporal difference. [ J Refract Surg. 2008;24:571–581.]

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/1081597x-20080601-05

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The corneal epithelium is about 53 μm deep and constitutes about 10% of the corneal thickness.

    “The corneal epithelium, on the other hand, is about 53 μm deep (Reinstein et al., 2008) and thus constitutes about 10% of the corneal thickness.”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Reinstein et al., 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Hogan, MJ.; Alvarado, JA.; Weddell, JE. Histology of the Human Eye. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Publishing; 1971.
  2. Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K. In vivo laser confocal microscopy of Bowman's layer of the cornea. Ophthalmology 2006;113:2203-2208. [PubMed: 17157133]
  3. Hanna C, O'Brien JE. Cell production and migration in the epithelial layer of the cornea. Arch Ophthalmol 1960;64:536-539. [PubMed: 13711262]
  4. Patel S, Marshall J, Fitzke FW III. Refractive index of the human corneal epithelium and stroma. J Refract Surg 1995;11:100-105. [PubMed: 7634138]
  5. Simon G, Ren Q, Kervick GN, Parel JM. Optics of the corneal epithelium. Refract Corneal Surg 1993;9:42-50. [PubMed: 8481372]
  6. Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Raevsky T, Simoni GJ, Lloyd HO, Najafi DJ, Rondeau MJ, Coleman DJ. Arc-scanning very high-frequency digital ultrasound for 3D pachymetric mapping of the corneal epithelium and stroma in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 2000;16:414-430. [PubMed: 10939721]
  7. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, Sorbara L, Kort R, Jones L. Topographical thickness of the epithelium and total cornea after overnight wear of reverse-geometry rigid contact lenses for myopia reduction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:4742-4746. [PubMed: 14578394]
  8. Feng Y, Simpson TL. Comparison of human central cornea and limbus in vivo using optical coherence tomography. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:416-419. [PubMed: 15894917]
  9. Ladage PM, Yamamoto K, Ren DH, Li L, Jester JV, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD. Effects of rigid and soft contact lens daily wear on corneal epithelium, tear lactate dehydrogenase, and bacterial binding to exfoliated epithelial cells. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1279-1288. [PubMed: 11425688]
  10. Møller-Pedersen T, Vogel M, Li HF, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Quantification of stromal thinning, epithelial thickness, and corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy using in vivo confocal microscopy. Ophthalmology 1997;104:360-368. [PubMed: 9082257]
  11. Pérez JG, Méijome JM, Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Erickson P. Corneal epithelial thinning profile induced by long-term wear of hydrogel lenses. Cornea 2003;22:304-307. [PubMed: 12792471]
  12. Li HF, Petroll WM, Moller-Pedersen T, Maurer JK, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Epithelial and corneal thickness measurements by in vivo confocal microscopy through focusing (CMTF). Curr Eye Res 1997;16:214-221. [PubMed: 9088737]
  13. Patel SV, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Confocal microscopy in vivo in corneas of long- term contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:995-1003. [PubMed: 11923239]
  14. Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. High-frequency ultrasound measurement of the thickness of the corneal epithelium. Refract Corneal Surg 1993;9:385-387. [PubMed: 8241045]
  15. Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Trokel SL, Coleman DJ. Corneal pachymetric topography. Ophthalmology 1994;101:432-438. [PubMed: 8127563]
  16. Ye SG, Harasiewicz KA, Pavlin CJ, Foster FS. Ultrasonic characterization of normal ocular tissue in the frequency range from 50 MHz to 100. MHz. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control 1995;42:8-14.
  17. Wang J, Thomas J, Cox I, Rollins A. Noncontact measurements of central corneal epithelial and flap thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:1812-1816. [PubMed: 15161844]
  18. Wirbelauer C, Pham DT. Monitoring corneal structures with slitlamp-adapted optical coherence tomography in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:1851-1860. [PubMed: 15342046]
  19. Haque S, Fonn D, Simpson T, Jones L. Corneal and epithelial thickness changes after 4 weeks of overnight corneal refractive therapy lens wear, measured with optical coherence tomography. Eye Contact Lens 2004;30:189-193. [PubMed: 15499246]
  20. Møller-Pedersen T, Li HF, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Confocal microscopic characterization of wound repair after photorefractive keratectomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39:487-501. [PubMed: 9501858]
  21. Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Rondeau MJ, Coleman DJ. Epithelial and corneal thickness measurements by high-frequency ultrasound digital signal processing. Ophthalmology 1994;101:140-146. [PubMed: 8302547]
  22. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL. Topographical thickness of the epithelium and total cornea after hydrogel and PMMA contact lens wear with eye closure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1070- 1074. [PubMed: 12601031]
  23. Bentivoglio AR, Bressman SB, Cassetta E, Carretta D, Tonali P, Albanese A. Analysis of blink rate patterns in normal subjects. Mov Disord 1997;12:1028-1034. [PubMed: 9399231]
  24. Doane MG. Interactions of eyelids and tears in corneal wetting and the dynamics of the normal human eyeblink. Am J Ophthalmol 1980;89:507-516. [PubMed: 7369314]
  25. Young G, Hunt C, Covey M. Clinical evaluation of factors influencing toric soft contact lens fit. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:11-19. [PubMed: 11828894]
  26. Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Sutton HF, Coleman DJ. Very high-frequency ultrasound corneal analysis identifies anatomic correlates of optical complications of lamellar refractive surgery: anatomic diagnosis in lamellar surgery. Ophthalmology 1999;106:474-482. [PubMed: 10080202]
  27. Gauthier CA, Epstein D, Holden BA, Tengroth B, Fagerholm P, Hamberg-Nyström H, Sievert R. Epithelial alterations following photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg 1995;11:113-118. [PubMed: 7634140]
  28. Gauthier CA, Holden BA, Epstein D, Tengroth B, Fagerholm P, Hamberg-Nyström H. Role of epithelial hyperplasia in regression following photorefractive keratectomy. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:545-548. [PubMed: 8759267]
  29. Lohmann CP, Reischl U, Marshall J. Regression and epithelial hyperplasia after myopic photorefractive keratectomy in a human cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:712-715. [PubMed: 10330651]
  30. Philipp WE, Speicher L, Göttinger W. Histological and immunohistochemical findings after laser in situ keratomileusis in human corneas. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:808-820. [PubMed: 12686254]
  31. Erie JC, Patel SV, McLaren JW, Ramirez M, Hodge DO, Maguire LJ, Bourne WM. Effect of myopic laser in situ keratomileusis on epithelial and stromal thickness: a confocal microscopy study. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1447-1452. [PubMed: 12153794]
  32. Spadea L, Fasciani R, Necozione S, Balestrazzi E. Role of the corneal epithelium in refractive changes following laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Refract Surg 2000;16:133-139. [PubMed: 10766381]
  33. Reinstein DZ, Ameline B, Puech M, Montefiore G, Laroche L. VHF digital ultrasound three- dimensional scanning in the diagnosis of myopic regression after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2005;21:480-484. [PubMed: 16209446]
  34. O'Brart DP, Lohmann CP, Klonos G, Corbett MC, Pollock WS, Kerr-Muir MG, Marshall J. The effects of topical corticosteroids and plasmin inhibitors on refractive outcome, haze, and visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy. A prospective, randomized, observer-masked study. Ophthalmology 1994 Sep;101(9):1565-74. [PubMed: 7522315]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reinstein, D. Z., Archer, T. J., Gobbe, M., Silverman, R. H., & Coleman, D. J.
Affiliations
  • London Vision Clinic (GB)
  • St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Venue
Journal of Refractive Surgery
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2008-06
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
571-581
ISSN
  • 1042-962X (ISSN-L)
  • 1081-597X
OpenAlex
W207370343
Cited by
379
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 21
FWCI
8.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Refractive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Dyson Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01eb000238-32, EB000238)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01‐EB000238, EB000238)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Keywords
corneal epithelial thickness, keratometry, spherical equivalent refraction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Body Weights and Measures, Epithelial Cells, Humans, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Epithelium, Corneal, Corneal Topography, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review