The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hippocampus: cognitive map or working memory?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hippocampus, space, and memory
Olton, D. S., Becker, J. T., & Handelmann, G. E. (1979) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00062713 · Cited by 2,018
Cited by
A triple dissociation of memory systems: Hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal striatum.
McDonald, R. J., & White, N. M. (2013) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/a0034883 · Cited by 1,044
Comparison between the behavioural effects of septal and hippocampal lesions: A review
Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (1983) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/0149-7634(83)90014-3 · Cited by 658
Sleep states and memory processes
Smith, C. (1995) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(95)00024-n · Cited by 473
Context, learning, and extinction
Gershman, S. J., Blei, D. M., & Niv, Y. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0017808 · Cited by 386
McNaughton, B. L., Barnes, C. A., Meltzer, J., & Sutherland, R. J. (1989) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00248904 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Nadel, L., & MacDonald, L.
- Venue
- Behavioral and Neural Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1980-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 405-409
- ISSN
- 0163-1047 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072758394
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hippocampus: cognitive map or working memory? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0163-1047(80)90430-6
- The paper
- Nadel, L., & MacDonald, L. (1980). Hippocampus: cognitive map or working memory? Behavioral and Neural Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0163-1047(80)90430-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
