Cited by 1,103Auditing, Earnings Management, GovernanceAccounting Theory and Financial ReportingCorporate Governance and Financial Management

Earnings quality: Evidence from the field

Open access
Dichev, Ilia D., Graham, John R., Harvey, Campbell R., Rajgopal, Shiva·2013·Journal of Accounting and Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.05.004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dichev, I. D., Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Corresponding author
Rajgopal, Shiva
Venue
Journal of Accounting and Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
56
Issue
2-3
Pages
1-33
ISSN
0165-4101 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040478843
Cited by
1,103
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 92 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 10
FWCI
292.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Accounting and Economics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Financial Management
Keywords
earnings quality, earnings management, earnings sustainability, peer comparison, accounting standard setting, matching principle, fair value accounting, rules-based accounting, audit function, public companies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review