CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 213Motor Control and AdaptationSport Psychology and PerformanceSports and Physical Education Research

Chapter 4 On The Specificity of Learning and the Role of Visual Information for Movement Control

Proteau, Luc·1992·Advances in Psychology
DOI 10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62011-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62011-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The specificity-of-learning hypothesis says learning integrates the most useful afferent information for a task, surpassing other sources such as proprioception.

    “The specificity-of-learning hypothesis states that learning involves integration of the most optimal sources of afferent information for performing the given task, thereby surpassing other sources of afferent information-for example, proprioception (Proteau, 1992).”

    From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Proteau, 1992

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Proteau, L.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Proteau, Luc
Venue
Advances in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1992
Pages
67-103
ISSN
0166-4115 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62011-7
OpenAlex
W1622298231
Cited by
213
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.49
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
Keywords
motor learning, visual information, motor control, afferent feedback, kinesthetic feedback, hybrid control model, ball catching, motor expertise, transfer of learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review