Cited by 26Sport Psychology and PerformanceSports and Physical Education ResearchMotor Control and Adaptation

Effects of Focus of Attention and Type of Practice on Learning and Self-Efficacy in Dart Throwing

Shafizadeh, Mohsen, Platt, Geoffrey K., Bahram, Abbas·2013·Perceptual and Motor Skills

Abstract

The present investigation studied the effect of focus of attention and type of practice on self-efficacy and learning during a demonstration of the dart-throwing skill. 48 university students ( M = 22.5 yr., SD = 3.6) without any experience of dart throwing were divided into four groups according to the type of practice (physical and observational) and focus of attention (internal and external) and practiced a dart-throwing task. Self-efficacy in dart throwing was measured at the pre-test, acquisition, and transfer phases. The internal-focus group concentrated on their limb function, whereas the external-focus group concentrated on the darts and the target during the demonstration. Observational groups only watched during the acquisition phase, then performed the task in the retention and transfer phases. There was a main effect of focus of attention in the retention and transfer phases after controlling self-efficacy, with external focus groups showing higher performance than internal focus groups. External focus of attention could facilitate the acquisition of a motor skill during observation and may build and/or be supported by self-efficacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2466/25.30.pms.117x12z5

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • External attentional focus contributes to enhanced expectancies for positive outcomes.

    “Furthermore, by reliably producing more successful performance outcomes and ease of movement as noted above, an external attentional focus contributes to enhanced expectancies for positive outcomes (Pascua, Wulf, and Lewthwaite, 2015;Shafizadeh, Platt, & Bahram, 2013;Wulf, Chiviacowsky, & Cardozo, 2014) through mechanisms described in earlier sections.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shafizadeh, M., Platt, G. K., & Bahram, A.
Affiliations
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Kharazmi University (IR)
Corresponding author
Shafizadeh, Mohsen
Venue
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Published
2013-08
Volume
117
Issue
1
Pages
182-192
ISSN
  • 0031-5125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-688X
OpenAlex
W2130650536
Cited by
26
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perceptual and Motor Skills (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
dart throwing, attentional focus, external focus, internal focus, observational practice, motor skill learning, self-efficacy, motor skill transfer, motor skill retention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Motor Skills, Orientation, Practice, Psychological, Psychomotor Performance, Retention, Psychology, Transfer, Psychology, Self Efficacy, Athletic Performance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review