Cited by 112Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationMemory Processes and Influences

Testing the importance of the caudal retrosplenial cortex for spatial memory in rats

Vann, S·2003·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Although there is evidence to suggest that the retrosplenial cortex is involved in spatial learning and memory, many lesion studies have left the more caudal part of this region intact so leaving its role untested. In the first experiment, rats with neurotoxic lesions of the caudal half of the retrosplenial cortex (RspC1) were tested on a reference memory task in the water-maze. The RspC1 animals were impaired on initial acquisition although they performed normally on a subsequent probe test. The second experiment looked at working memory in the radial-arm maze and water-maze. Animals with caudal retrosplenial lesions (RspC2) were unimpaired on the acquisition stage of the radial-arm maze task but were impaired when the task involved maze rotation to control for the possible use of intramaze cues. The RspC2 animals also took longer to learn the platform position on a delayed matching-to-place task in the water-maze. These results show a subtle impairment in spatial memory performance that is not as severe as that seen when more complete lesions of the retrosplenial cortex are made.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00274-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are additive effects as more anterior cingulate and retrosplenial cortex disconnections occur.

    “Consequently, there are additive effects as more anterior cingulate and retrosplenial cortex disconnections occur (see Vann et al., 2003).”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Vann et al., 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vann, S.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Vann, S
ORCID
Vann, S
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-03-18
Volume
140
Issue
1-2
Pages
107-118
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048129186
Cited by
112
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
spatial memory, spatial learning, neurotoxic lesion, reference memory, working memory, water maze, radial maze, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Discrimination Learning, Male, Memory, Neural Pathways, Space Perception, Spatial Behavior, Time Factors, N-Methylaspartate, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Entorhinal Cortex, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review