The effects of local application of D2 selective dopaminergic drugs into the medial prefrontal cortex of rats in a delayed spatial choice task
Abstract
The study examined the effects of modulation of dopamine D2 receptors-mediated neurotransmission in the rat's prefrontal cortex (PFC) on storage and executive components of working memory. Rats were trained on delayed (delay interval, 3 s) and non-delayed choice in a U-maze. The prominence of proactive interference was evaluated by sorting errors in a current trial on the basis of animal reactions in a preceding trial. The erroneous runs to the same arm of the maze as in the previous trial were identified as the repetitions (RE) and the erroneous runs to the other arm in comparison with the previous trial were classified as alternations (AE). The bilateral microinfusion of D2 agonists PPHT (0.004 microg, 0.04 microg, 0.4 microg/1 microl) into medial wall of the PFC produced a dose-dependent increase in the error rate of the delayed-response task and did not influence non-delayed choice. In delay condition PPHT enhanced the perseverative tendencies (the rate of RE was significantly higher than the rate of AE), in non-delayed choice the erroneous performance was mainly represented by AE. In contrast, the infusion of D2-receptor antagonist sulpiride (0.03 microg, 0.3 microg, 3 microg/1 microl) increased the accuracy of delayed choice and changed the mode of intertrial dependence-rats made significantly more AE than RE. The results are discussed in terms of the involvement of D2 receptor dependent transmission of the PFC in different cognitive processes related to the delayed per…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Excessive D2 receptor stimulation impairs prefrontal cortex working memory function in animals and humans and is associated with increased response-related firing in monkeys and increased response-related blood oxygen level-dependent signals in human imaging studies.
“excessive D2 receptor stimulation impairs PFC working memory function in animals69 and humans70 and is associated with increased response-related firing in monkeys71 and increased response-related blood oxygen level-dependent signals in human imaging studies70.”
From Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function (2009) · cites this paper as [69]
Cites
Modulation of memory fields by dopamine Dl receptors in prefrontal cortex
Williams, G. V., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/376572a0 · Cited by 1,593 · see citing works
Roberts, A., De Salvia, M., Wilkinson, L., Collins, P., Muir, J., Everitt, B., & Robbins, T. (1994) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-05-02531.1994 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function
Arnsten, A. F. T. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2648 · Cited by 3,299 · see citing works
Durstewitz, D., & Seamans, J. K. (2008) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.05.015 · Cited by 586 · see citing works
Mesocortical dopamine modulation of executive functions: beyond working memory
Floresco, S. B., & Magyar, O. (2006) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0404-5 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Tseng, K. Y., & O'Donnell, P. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1021-04.2004 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Multiple dopamine receptor subtypes in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat regulate set-shifting
Floresco, S. B., Magyar, O., Ghods-Sharifi, S., Vexelman, C., & Tse, M. T. L. (2006) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300825 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Floresco, S. B. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00062 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Chemistry of the adaptive mind
Cools, R., & Robbins, T. W. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2004.1468 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Gee, S., Ellwood, I., Patel, T., Luongo, F., Deisseroth, K., & Sohal, V. S. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5835-11.2012 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Tseng, K. Y., & O'Donnell, P. (2007) · Synapse · doi:10.1002/syn.20432 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
- Authors
- Druzin, M. Y., Kurzina, N. P., Malinina, E. P., & Kozlov, A. P.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Experimental Medicine (RU)
- St Petersburg University (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Kozlov, Andrej P
- Venue
- Behavioural Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-111
- ISSN
- 0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048148249
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- dopamine D2 receptor, medial prefrontal cortex, working memory, proactive interference, perseveration, sulpiride, microinfusion, executive function
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Male, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Dopamine Agents, Rats, Wistar, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Maze Learning, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review