Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 472

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Perceiving and managing business risks: differences between entrepreneurs and bankers

Open access
Sarasvathy, D.K., Simon, Herbert A., Lave, Lester·1998·Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

Abstract

Enquiring about the "risk propensity" of entrepreneurs is misguided, because all economic actors deal with risk and uncertainty. The success of entrepreneurs is tied closely to the way in which they perceive and manage risk. This study compares bankers and entrepreneurs in their cognitive approaches to solving problems involving a variety of risks; relevant is not risk propensity, but feelings of control and responsibility and personal values. Verbal think-aloud protocols were used to analyze the responses and thought processes of four bankers and four entrepreneurs in Pittsburgh, to a set of problems. Five problems were posed, involving financial risk, risk to human life and health, and risk of natural disaster. Content analysis identified five variables: ability to control possible returns to the decision; ability to control risks involved in the problem; factors internal to the firm; factors external to the firm; and personal considerations in the decision. The various problem spaces were defined as issues of risk, issues of control, or a function of values and personal responsibility. Entrepreneurs were found to accept risk and focus on controlling outcomes at any level of risk; they frame problem spaces with personal values and assume greater personal responsibility for affecting outcomes. Bankers use target outcomes as reference points; they attempt to control risk within existing structured problem spaces to avoid situations where they are exposed to higher levels of personal responsibility. (TNM)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0167-2681(97)00092-9

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sarasvathy, D. K., Simon, H. A., & Lave, L.
Venue
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-01
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
207-225
ISSN
0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170130400
Cited by
472
References
0
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.