Cited by 986Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyInnovation and Knowledge Management

Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums

Ozgen, Eren, Baron, Robert A.·2007·Journal of Business Venturing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.12.001

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ozgen, E., & Baron, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Troy University (US)
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Baron, Robert A.
Venue
Journal of Business Venturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
174-192
ISSN
0883-9026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040396579
Cited by
986
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 49
FWCI
43.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Venturing (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
opportunity recognition, mentors, professional forum, self-efficacy, entrepreneurs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review