Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimism, overconfidence and entrepreneurial activity

Trevelyan, Rose·2008·Management Decision

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to explore the question of confidence in entrepreneurship, and the impact confidence has on key tasks in the venture development process. Design/methodology/approach: Propositions about the relationship between key elements of confidence (optimism and overconfidence) are made in order to unpack the confidence construct. Simple tests of these propositions are conducted using a small sample of Australian entrepreneurs. Further propositions are made about the impact of optimism and overconfidence on activity across different phases of the new venture development process. Findings: Two elements of confidence, optimism and overconfidence, are distinct in their association with each other and with a third individual difference (regulatory focus). The dual and sometimes opposing impacts of optimism and overconfidence on new venture activity are explored. Optimism and overconfidence are both beneficial when deciding to become an entrepreneur, but overconfidence is harmful when making decisions in response to setbacks. Research limitations/implications: Conclusions are limited by the sample size and simple analytical techniques. Rather, the impact of the paper is in the implications of the independence of optimism and overconfidence. Future research can explore and test the propositions made about when each is harmful and when beneficial. Practical implications: For entrepreneurs, it is important to be aware of your optimism and overconfidence in different situations. When optimism is beneficial, use it, but when overconfidence is harmful, mitigate against it by asking the right questions and working with others to check assumptions and strategies. Originality/value: This paper distinguishes between two individual differences, optimism and overconfidence, that are typically thought to be interdependent and beneficial for entrepreneurs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/00251740810890177

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Audia, P.G., Locke, E.A. and Smith, K.G. (2000), “The paradox of success”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43 No. 5, pp. 837‐53.
  2. Baron, R.A. (1998), “Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 275‐94.
  3. Baron, R.A. (2007), “Entrepreneurship: a process perspective”, in Baum, J.R., Frese, M. and Baron, R.A. (Eds), The Psychology of Entrepreneurship, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 19‐39.
  4. Baron, R.A. and Ensley, M.D. (2006), “Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs”, Management Science, Vol. 52 No. 9, p. 1331.
  5. Baum, J.R. and Locke, E.A. (2004), “The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 89 No. 4, pp. 587‐98.
  6. Bazerman, M.H. (1998), Judgement in Managerial Decision‐making, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
  7. Boyd, N.G. and Vozikis, G.S. (1994), “The influence of self‐efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 63‐77.
  8. Brissette, I., Scheier, M.F. and Carver, C.S. (2002), “The role of optimism in social network development, coping, and psychological adjustment during a life transition”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 82 No. 1, p. 102.
  9. Brockner, J., Higgins, E.T. and Low, M.B. (2004), “Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 203‐20.
  10. Busenitz, L.W. and Arthurs, J.D. (2007), “Cognition and capabilities in entrepreneurial ventures”, in Baum, J.R., Frese, M. and Baron, R.A. (Eds), The Psychology of Entrepreneurship, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 131‐50.
  11. Busenitz, L.W. and Barney, J.B. (1997), “Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases and heuristics in strategic decision making”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 9‐30.
  12. Camerer, C. and Lovallo, D. (1999), “Overconfidence and excess entry: an experimental approach”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 89 No. 1, pp. 306‐18.
  13. Carter, N.M., Gartner, W.B., Shaver, K.G. and Gatewood, E.J. (2003), “The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 13‐39.
  14. Delmar, F. and Shane, S. (2003), “Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 12, p. 1165.
  15. Delmar, F. and Shane, S. (2004), “Legitimating first: organizing activities and the survival of new ventures”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 385‐410.
  16. Dosi, G. and Lovallo, D. (1997), “Rational entrepreneurs or optimistic martyrs?”, in Garud, R., Nayyar, P. and Shapira, Z. (Eds), Technological Innovation: Oversights and Foresights, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  17. Forbes, D.P. (2005), “Are some entrepreneurs more overconfident than others?”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 623‐40.
  18. Forbes, D.P. (1999), “Cognitive approaches to new venture creation”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 415‐39.
  19. Frese, M. (2007), “The psychological actions and entrepreneurial success: an action theory approach”, in Baum, J.R., Frese, M. and Baron, R.A. (Eds), The Psychology of Entrepreneurship, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 151‐88.
  20. Gartner, W.B. (1989), “Some suggestions for research on entrepreneurial traits and characteristics”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 27‐37.
  21. Gatewood, E.J., Shaver, K.G. and Gartner, W.B. (1995), “A longitudinal study of cognitive factors influencing start‐up behaviours and success at venture creation”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 10 No. 5, pp. 371‐91.
  22. Gist, M.E. and Mitchell, T.R. (1992), “Self‐efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 183‐211.
  23. Griffin, D.W. and Varey, C.A. (1996), “Towards a consensus on overconfidence”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 65 No. 3, p. 227.
  24. Gruber, M. (2007), “Uncovering the value of planning in new venture creation: a process and contingency perspective”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 782‐807.
  25. Hayward, M.L.A. and Hambrick, D.C. (1997), “Explaining the premium paid for large acquisitions: evidence of CEO hubris”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42 No. 1, p. 103.
  26. Hayward, M.L.A., Shepherd, D.A. and Griffin, D. (2006), “A hubris theory of entrepreneurship”, Management Science, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 160‐72.
  27. Higgins, E.T. (1998), “Promotion and prevention: regulatory focus as a motivational principle”, in Zanna, M.P. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 30, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 1‐46. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Higgins, E.T., Friedman, R.S., Harlow, R.E., Idson, L.C., Ayduk, O.N. and Taylor, A. (2001), “Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: promotion pride versus prevention pride”, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 3‐23.
  29. Kaish, S. and Gilad, B. (1991), “Characteristics of opportunities search of entrepreneurs versus executives: sources, interests, general alertness”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 45‐61.
  30. Kickul, J. and D'Intino, R.S. (2005), “Measure for measure: modeling entrepreneurial self‐efficacy into instrumental tasks in the new venture creation process”, New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 39‐47.
  31. Klayman, J., Soll, J.B., Gonzalez‐Vallejo, C. and Barlas, S. (1999), “Overconfidence: it depends on how, what, and whom you ask”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 79 No. 3, p. 216.
  32. Lichtenstein, S. and Fischoff, B. (1977), “Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? The calibration of probability judgments”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 20, pp. 259‐183.
  33. Litt, M.D., Tennen, H., Affleck, G. and Klock, S. (1992), “Coping and cognitive factors in adaptation to in vitro fertilization failure”, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 15, pp. 171‐87.
  34. Lounsbury, J.W., Steel, R.P., Loveland, J.M. and Gibson, L.W. (2004), “An investigation of personality traits in relation to adolescent school absenteeism”, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol. 33 No. 5, p. 457.
  35. Lovallo, D. and Kahneman, D. (2003), “Delusions of success: how optimism undermines executives' decisions”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 81 No. 7, p. 56.
  36. Lowe, R.A. and Ziedonis, A.A. (2006), “Overoptimism and the performance of entrepreneurial firms”, Management Science, Vol. 52 No. 2, p. 173.
  37. McColl‐Kennedy, J.R. and Anderson, R.D. (2005), “Subordinate‐manager gender combination and perceived leadership style influence on emotions, self‐esteem and organizational commitment”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58 No. 2, p. 115.
  38. McMullen, J.S. and Shepherd, D.A. (2006), “Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 132‐52.
  39. Markman, G.D., Balkin, D.B. and Baron, R.A. (2002), “Inventors and new venture formation: the effects of general self‐efficacy and regretful thinking”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 149‐65.
  40. Markman, G.D., Baron, R.A. and Balkin, D. (2005), “Are perseverance and self‐efficacy costless? Assessing entrepreneurs' regretful thinking”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 1‐19.
  41. Minniti, M. and Bygrave, W.D. (2001), “A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 5‐16.
  42. Mitchell, R.K., Busenitz, L.W., Bird, B., Gaglio, C.M., McMullen, J., Morse, E. and Smith, J. (2007), “The central question in entrepreneurial cognition research 2007”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 1‐27.
  43. Ottesen, G.G. and Gronhaug, K. (2005), “Positive illusions and new venture creation: conceptual issues and an empirical illustration”, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol. 14.
  44. Palich, L.E. and Bagby, D.R. (1995), “Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk‐taking: challenging conventional wisdom”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 10 No. 6, pp. 425‐38.
  45. Parker, S.C. (2006), “Learning about the unknown: how fast do entrepreneurs adjust their beliefs?”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 21, pp. 1‐26.
  46. Rauch, A. and Frese, M. (2007), “Born to be an entrepreneur? Revisiting the personality approach to entrepreneurship”, in Baum, J.R., Frese, M. and Baron, R.A. (Eds), The Psychology of Entrepreneurship, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 41‐65.
  47. Russo, J.E. and Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1992), “Managing overconfidence”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 7‐17.
  48. Sarasvathy, D.K., Simon, H.A. and Lave, L. (1998), “Perceiving and managing business risks: differences between entrepreneurs and bankers”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 33 No. 2, p. 207.
  49. Seligman, M.E.P. and Schulman, P. (1986), “Explanatory style as a predictor of productivity and quitting amongst life insurance sales agents”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50, pp. 832‐8. · DOI
  50. Seo, M.‐G., Barrett, L.F. and Bartunek, J.M. (2004), “The role of affective experience in work motivation”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 423‐39.
  51. Shook, C.L., Priem, R.L. and McGee, J.E. (2003), “Venture creation and the enterprising individual: a review and synthesis”, Journal of Management, Vol. 29 No. 3, p. 379.
  52. Simon, M. and Houghton, S.M. (2003), “The relationship between overconfidence and the introduction of risky products: evidence from a field study”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 46 No. 2, p. 139.
  53. Simon, M., Houghton, S.M. and Aquino, K. (2000), “Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 113‐34.
  54. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974), “Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases”, Science, Vol. 27, pp. 1124‐31.
  55. Venkataraman, S. (1997), “The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor's perspective”, in Katz, J. (Ed.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, Vol. 3, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 119‐38.
  56. Whyte, G., Saks, A.M. and Hook, S. (1997), “When success breeds failure: the role of self‐efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 415‐32.
  57. Zacharakis, A. and Shepherd, D.A. (2001), “The nature of information and overconfidence on venture capitalist's decision‐making”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 311‐32.
  58. Zhao, H. and Seibert, S.E. (2006), “The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: a meta‐analytical review”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92 No. 2, pp. 259‐71.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Trevelyan, R.
Venue
Management Decision
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2008-08-01
Volume
46
Issue
7
Pages
986-1001
ISSN
0025-1747
Cited by
165
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review