The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-image – is it in the bag? A qualitative comparison between “ordinary” and “excessive” consumers
Open accessAbstract
An in-depth thematic analysis is presented of 32 interviews, which examined commonsense definitions of impulsive and planned buying, characteristics of typical impulse buy episodes, motivations for impulsive buying, issues of self-image and self-presentation, and regret. Ten interviews each were conducted with “ordinary” men and women consumers, and a further 10 with women classified as “excessive shoppers” (more commonly referred to as “compulsive buyers”). Two male excessive consumers were also interviewed. Distinctive patterns emerged for each different shopper group. Findings show that impulse buying, regret and other concepts have complex meanings beyond those that can be measured easily in survey research, and that the level of sophistication and reflexivity about one’s shopping behaviour is far greater in excessive shoppers. On the basis of the gender differences found, it is proposed that self and shopping are more closely linked for women than for men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232669 · Cited by 4,042
Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities
Mccracken, G. (1990) · doi:10.2979/1450.0 · Cited by 1,058
The significance of impulse buying today.
Stern, H. (1962) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224296202600212 · Cited by 1,049
Qualitative research and psychological theorizing
Henwood, K. L., & Pidgeon, N. F. (1992) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02426.x · Cited by 808
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (1999) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430299024005 · Cited by 355
Self-citation
Cited by
Dittmar, H. (2005) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712605x53533 · Cited by 567
Self-citationExploring the gap between consumers’ green rhetoric and purchasing behaviour
Johnstone, M.-L., & Tan, L. P. (2015) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2316-3 · Cited by 413
Olivero, N., & Lunt, P. (2004) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0167-4870(02)00172-1 · Cited by 271
The joint moderating role of trust propensity and gender on consumers’ online shopping behavior.
Chen, Y., Yan, X., Fan, W., & Gordon, M. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.020 · Cited by 200
Narcissism and consumer behaviour: a review and preliminary findings
Cisek, S. Z., Sedikides, C., Hart, C. M., Godwin, H. J., Benson, V., & Liversedge, S. P. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00232 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Dittmar, H., & Drury, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-142
- ISSN
- 0167-4870 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096942866
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-image – is it in the bag? A qualitative comparison between “ordinary” and “excessive” consumers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0167-4870(99)00039-2
- The paper
- Dittmar, H., & Drury, J. (2000). Self-image – is it in the bag? A qualitative comparison between “ordinary” and “excessive” consumers. Journal of Economic Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4870(99)00039-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.